H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jan Vacek vs Adrian Voinea H2H: 1-0
Jan Vacek holds a 1–0 lead over Adrian Voinea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Vacek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan Vacek won the 2002 Wimbledon third round 6-1 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Jan Vacek | 6-1 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Adrian Voinea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Vacek | #1,155 | #61 | 646 | 1,640 | 30 | 59 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Adrian Voinea | #1,046 | #36 | 957 | 1,756 | 126 | 168 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Vacek | Adrian Voinea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #56 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #45 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #71 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #110 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #110 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #129 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #176 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,463 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #298 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #235 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #563 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |