H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Janko Tipsarevic vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 1-0
Janko Tipsarevic holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Janko Tipsarevic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Janko Tipsarevic won the 2017 Quito third round 4-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2017* | Quito | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Janko Tipsarevic | 4-1 (ret.) | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janko Tipsarevic | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |