H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Janko Tipsarevic vs Florent Serra H2H: 1-1
Janko Tipsarevic and Florent Serra are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Janko Tipsarevic leads 1–0 on grass, while Florent Serra leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Florent Serra won the 2009 US Open first round 7-6(8) 7-6(5) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2009* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Florent Serra | 7-6(8) 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2007* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Janko Tipsarevic | 6-3 6-2 6-7(3) 3-6 6-2 | Florent Serra | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Florent Serra | #942 | #36 | 1,371 | 1,816 | 123 | 170 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janko Tipsarevic | Florent Serra | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #213 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #60 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #65 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #69 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #171 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |