H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Janko Tipsarevic vs Ricardo Mello H2H: 0-1
Ricardo Mello holds a 1–0 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ricardo Mello leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ricardo Mello won the 2004 Shanghai fourth round 1-6 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 45
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2004* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ricardo Mello | 1-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| May 26, 2003 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q1 | Clay | Janko Tipsarevic | 3-6 7-6(1) 6-4 | Ricardo Mello | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Ricardo Mello | #1,018 | #50 | 738 | 1,773 | 52 | 87 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janko Tipsarevic | Ricardo Mello | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #133 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #128 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #71 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #134 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #257 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #85 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1018 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |