H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Janko Tipsarevic vs Ze Zhang H2H: 1-0
Janko Tipsarevic holds a 1–0 lead over Ze Zhang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Janko Tipsarevic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janko Tipsarevic won the 2016 Shenzhen third round 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2016* | Shenzhen | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Janko Tipsarevic | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Ze Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Ze Zhang | #1,385 | #148 | 374 | 1,586 | 5 | 23 | 17.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Janko Tipsarevic | Ze Zhang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #292 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #189 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |