H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jannik Sinner vs David Goffin H2H: 2-0
Jannik Sinner holds a 2–0 lead over David Goffin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jannik Sinner leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jannik Sinner won the 2020 Roland Garros first round 7-5 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 24
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Belgium
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jannik Sinner | 7-5 6-0 6-3 | David Goffin | Match data |
| Feb 14, 2020* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Jannik Sinner | 7-6(7) 7-5 | David Goffin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jannik Sinner | #1 | #1 | 14,750 | 2,413 | 351 | 92 | 79.2% | 5 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 30 |
| David Goffin | #251 | #7 | 3,775 | 2,099 | 325 | 264 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jannik Sinner | David Goffin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #37 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,001 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #15 | 2,031 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,197 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 71–7 | 91.0% | #1 | 2,360 | 2 | 18 | 2013 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #110 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 58–6 | 90.6% | #2 | 2,381 | 4 | 24 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2026 | 44–3 | 93.6% | #1 | 2,395 | 5 | 30 | 2015 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #16 | 1,984 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #11 | 2,020 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 53–24 | 68.8% | #7 | 2,061 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #22 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #11 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,710 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #52 | 1,825 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 |