H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jannik Sinner vs Mikael Ymer H2H: 2-1
Jannik Sinner holds a 2–1 lead over Mikael Ymer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jannik Sinner leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jannik Sinner won the 2022 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-3 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 24
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Sweden
Age 27
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2022* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Jannik Sinner | 6-4 6-3 5-7 6-2 | Mikael Ymer | Match data |
| Jun 5, 2021* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Jannik Sinner | 6-1 7-5 6-3 | Mikael Ymer | Match data |
| Feb 6, 2020* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mikael Ymer | 6-3 6-4 | Jannik Sinner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jannik Sinner | #1 | #1 | 14,750 | 2,413 | 351 | 92 | 79.2% | 5 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 30 |
| Mikael Ymer | #626 | #50 | 981 | 1,861 | 58 | 74 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jannik Sinner | Mikael Ymer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #596 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #497 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #37 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,001 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #255 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #15 | 2,031 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,197 | 0 | 10 | 2020 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 71–7 | 91.0% | #1 | 2,360 | 2 | 18 | 2021 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #94 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 58–6 | 90.6% | #2 | 2,381 | 4 | 24 | 2022 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 44–3 | 93.6% | #1 | 2,395 | 5 | 30 | 2023 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |