H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs David Guez

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Jarkko Nieminen vs David Guez.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 45 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
David Guez
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jarkko Nieminen #41 6-1 7-5 David Guez #144 Match data Nov 1, 2010 Q2 Q Swiss Indoors ATP 500 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,920 363 339 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
David Guez #546 #116 449 1,641 2 16 11.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen David Guez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,729 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2004 18–17 51.4% #77 1,692 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,795 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,790 0 1 2007 0–2 0.0% #184 1,517 0 0
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,815 0 1 2008 0–2 0.0% #205 1,525 0 0
26 2008 24–27 47.1% #37 1,751 0 1 2009 2–2 50.0% #146 1,599 0 0
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,679 0 1 2010 0–5 0.0% #169 1,581 0 0
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,880 0 1 2011 0–1 0.0% #197 1,581 0 0
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,832 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2012 24–27 47.1% #41 1,752 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2013 31–27 53.4% #39 1,794 0 2 2014 0–2 0.0% #209 1,550 0 0
32 2014 23–26 46.9% #73 1,764 0 2 2015 0–1 0.0% #168 1,595 0 0
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,691 0 2 2016 0–1 0.0% #420 1,578 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jarkko Nieminen David Guez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 10 14 24 41.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 15 15 30 50.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 28 14 42 66.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 20 17 37 54.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2008 17 18 35 48.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 22 16 38 57.9% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2011 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 17 16 33 51.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 21 18 39 53.8% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 14 15 29 48.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 231 209 440 52.5% 98 87 185 53.0% 25 32 57 43.9% 9 11 20 45.0% — 2 12 14 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 681/701 of Jarkko Nieminen's and 18/18 of David Guez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jarkko Nieminen David Guez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2001 3/5 7.0 3.7 64.8% 67.0% 52.6% 38.3% 58.7% 62.1% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 44/51 2.5 2.9 62.7% 65.7% 51.6% 53.5% 45.5% 60.3% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 65/66 3.1 1.7 68.1% 66.3% 52.3% 58.9% 43.1% 61.2% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 32/35 2.8 2.8 63.1% 67.8% 49.7% 56.3% 43.9% 60.9% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 51/51 2.3 1.9 65.9% 65.2% 50.8% 61.7% 47.0% 60.4% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 76/76 3.8 1.8 62.5% 70.2% 52.6% 62.4% 50.8% 63.5% 39.4% 2007 2/2 2.0 1.5 55.9% 62.6% 43.3% 50.0% 45.0% 53.9% 30.3%
25 2007 57/57 3.1 1.8 65.7% 69.8% 51.0% 55.5% 42.4% 63.2% 40.4% 2008 2/2 1.0 1.5 57.3% 61.7% 49.4% 41.4% 20.0% 56.5% 28.5%
26 2008 50/51 3.0 2.1 67.1% 65.8% 49.5% 55.0% 45.4% 60.6% 37.8% 2009 4/4 1.0 2.5 53.0% 58.6% 54.9% 58.2% 40.5% 56.9% 38.0%
27 2009 23/25 2.9 2.0 63.4% 66.4% 51.4% 57.2% 42.4% 61.1% 37.7% 2010 5/5 0.2 2.4 59.2% 58.4% 49.3% 38.9% 62.0% 54.9% 30.9%
28 2010 54/55 4.0 2.1 70.2% 70.2% 51.8% 60.6% 40.5% 64.5% 36.9% 2011 1/1 0.0 2.0 55.7% 61.8% 48.1% 55.6% 40.0% 55.7% 36.0%
29 2011 45/45 3.1 2.3 63.3% 66.7% 52.7% 51.6% 46.2% 61.2% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 49/51 2.9 2.0 68.0% 67.4% 48.1% 52.4% 43.1% 61.1% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 57/58 3.3 2.2 65.6% 67.4% 51.6% 58.1% 45.4% 62.0% 38.3% 2014 2/2 3.5 0.5 61.7% 57.3% 37.1% 41.9% 46.4% 49.4% 35.4%
32 2014 49/49 3.2 2.6 64.8% 69.0% 50.1% 54.1% 43.3% 62.5% 37.1% 2015 1/1 4.0 2.0 56.1% 63.0% 61.1% 25.0% 20.0% 62.2% 35.2%
33 2015 26/26 3.5 2.0 64.8% 67.0% 47.0% 58.4% 48.9% 59.9% 35.0% 2016 1/1 1.0 4.0 57.6% 58.5% 51.3% 50.0% 25.0% 55.4% 38.5%
Career — 681/702 3.2 2.1 65.5% 67.7% 51.0% 57.1% 45.0% 61.8% 38.4% — 18/18 1.3 2.1 57.1% 59.6% 49.2% 45.8% 43.3% 55.3% 33.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jarkko Nieminen David Guez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1495 104.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1608 123.2 +0.61 +1.71 1.100 52.3% +13 — — 76.9% +1.38 0–1 2–0 — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1703 142.5 -1.24 +1.57 0.997 50.1% -45 +40 -185 48.4% -0.13 9–7 (56%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1729 140.9 -0.12 +2.38 1.030 50.4% -35 +85 -165 51.1% +0.21 18–10 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — -1.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1693 138.9 -1.64 +2.77 1.010 50.2% +2 +122 — 50.0% +0.06 6–2 (75%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.07 2005 1481 95.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 1796 147.3 -1.48 +2.47 1.008 50.2% -4 +57 — 57.3% +0.28 10–9 (53%) 17–8 (68%) — -2.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 1790 144.5 +1.14 +1.94 1.079 51.7% +1 +35 -85 63.0% +0.77 15–14 (52%) 25–15 (63%) — +3.02 2007 1517 108.8 -1.82 -1.25 0.657 44.0% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 1–0 — -0.02
25 2007 1815 149.2 +0.54 +3.30 1.098 51.4% +4 -52 -56 53.1% +0.26 9–10 (47%) 13–9 (59%) — +0.31 2008 1525 100.6 +0.91 -2.26 0.654 42.3% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.11
26 2008 1751 142.7 -1.76 +1.34 0.960 49.4% +12 +26 -24 48.5% -0.11 6–8 (43%) 10–10 (50%) — +1.39 2009 1600 116.8 -0.98 +2.39 0.881 47.6% +38 — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.15
27 2009 1680 134.6 -1.97 +1.08 0.969 49.3% +9 — — 48.1% -0.20 1–7 (13%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.07 2010 1582 115.2 -2.68 -1.94 0.685 43.4% +26 — — 14.3% -1.57 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.05
28 2010 1880 148.3 +0.94 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +5 -146 -149 51.4% +0.36 10–11 (48%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.24 2011 1581 107.2 -0.92 -0.41 0.813 45.7% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–0 — -0.02
29 2011 1832 150.6 -0.65 -0.67 0.921 48.7% +2 -26 -186 46.0% -0.27 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) — -2.73 2012 1565 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1752 149.6 -1.35 +0.73 0.950 49.5% +56 +12 -102 44.2% -0.23 7–5 (58%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.02 2013 1500 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1795 155.2 -1.06 +2.01 1.008 50.4% +6 +18 -185 51.0% +0.23 14–10 (58%) 14–12 (54%) — -0.63 2014 1550 115.1 -2.56 +1.50 0.700 42.8% — — — 16.7% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.02
32 2014 1765 141.8 -1.21 +0.74 0.990 49.9% -22 -29 -99 47.4% -0.17 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) — -0.46 2015 1595 115.0 -0.41 +2.01 0.930 48.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.11
33 2015 1692 136.3 -2.79 -0.68 0.873 47.9% +14 -6 +35 39.1% -0.68 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.18 2016 1578 104.5 -3.17 -1.07 0.863 46.4% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.27
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1546 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1921 151.5 -0.65 +1.56 1.005 50.2% 0 +14 -108 51.2% +0.11 126–118 (52%) 157–133 (54%) 102.3 -0.51 — 1641 113.0 -1.60 -0.20 0.751 44.8% +33 — — 23.4% -1.74 0–5 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 93.7 -0.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.