H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 0-5

Ernests Gulbis holds a 5–0 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ernests Gulbis leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ernests Gulbis won the 2013 Rome Masters second round 6-2 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Ernests Gulbis
LAT Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 14, 2013* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Ernests Gulbis #46 6-2 7-6(6) Jarkko Nieminen #41 Match data
May 2, 2013* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Ernests Gulbis #47 6-4 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #42 Match data
Feb 21, 2013* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Ernests Gulbis #118 6-3 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #54 Match data
Feb 27, 2010* Delray Beach ATP 250 SF Hard Ernests Gulbis #72 6-4 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #109 Match data
Jul 30, 2008* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Ernests Gulbis #53 7-6(7) 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,139 221 232 48.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 2008 22–20 52.4% #53 1,815 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,696 0 0
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,845 0 1
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,774 0 2
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,727 0 2
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,939 0 4
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,917 0 6
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,716 0 6
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,813 0 6
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,533 0 6
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,562 0 6
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2 — — — — — — —