H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 5-0

Jarkko Nieminen holds a 5–0 lead over Frank Dancevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 5–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2008 Australian Open first round 6-3 6-1 5-7 2-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Frank Dancevic
CAN Age 41 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 16, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #26 6-3 6-1 5-7 2-6 6-1 Frank Dancevic #74 Match data
Jan 4, 2008* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #27 6-4 6-1 Frank Dancevic #72 Match data
Sep 29, 2006* Bangkok ATP 250 R16 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #17 2-6 7-6(3) 6-4 Frank Dancevic #92 Match data
Aug 10, 2006* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #15 6-2 6-3 Frank Dancevic #97 Match data
Aug 15, 2002* Washington ATP 250 R32 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #34 7-5 6-0 Frank Dancevic #587 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,773 54 89 37.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Frank Dancevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #434 1,505 0 0
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,473 0 0
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,558 0 0
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0 2008 6–10 37.5% #130 1,660 0 0
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,700 0 0
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,664 0 0
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,605 0 0
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,688 0 0
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,662 0 0
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2 — — — — — — —