H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 3-0

Jarkko Nieminen holds a 3–0 lead over Jurgen Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2010 Bangkok quarterfinal 6-3 7-6(4).

FIN Age 45 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 0
3 main-draw meetings
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jarkko Nieminen #60 6-3 7-6(4) Jurgen Melzer #13 Match data Oct 2, 2010* QF Bangkok ATP 250 Hard
Jarkko Nieminen #66 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #37 Match data Jul 21, 2005* R32 Stuttgart Open ATP International Series Gold modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Jarkko Nieminen #87 6-3 7-5 Jurgen Melzer #33 Match data Jan 13, 2005* R32 Sydney International ATP International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,920 363 339 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,017 331 307 51.9% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,729 0 0 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,660 0 0
22 2004 18–17 51.4% #77 1,692 0 0 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,583 0 0
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,795 0 0 2004 27–23 54.0% #39 1,759 0 0
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,790 0 1 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,815 0 1 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,774 0 1
26 2008 24–27 47.1% #37 1,751 0 1 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,696 0 1
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,679 0 1 2008 29–24 54.7% #34 1,800 0 1
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,880 0 1 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,927 0 2
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,832 0 1 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,985 0 3
30 2012 24–27 47.1% #41 1,752 0 2 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,797 0 3
31 2013 31–27 53.4% #39 1,794 0 2 2012 18–23 43.9% #29 1,755 0 4
32 2014 23–26 46.9% #73 1,764 0 2 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,826 0 5
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,691 0 2 2014 14–20 41.2% #113 1,757 0 5
34 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,769 0 5
36 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,708 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Jurgen Melzer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2001 4 1 5 80.0% 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2002 10 14 24 41.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2001 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2003 15 15 30 50.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2004 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2003 2 7 9 22.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 2006 28 14 42 66.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2005 10 14 24 41.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2007 20 17 37 54.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 2006 9 11 20 45.0% 20 9 29 69.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2008 17 18 35 48.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 14 14 28 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2009 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 17 15 32 53.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2010 22 16 38 57.9% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2009 19 15 34 55.9% 12 9 21 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 2011 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2010 28 15 43 65.1% 17 8 25 68.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 2012 17 16 33 51.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2011 10 13 23 43.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2013 21 18 39 53.8% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2012 14 16 30 46.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 2014 14 15 29 48.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2013 19 13 32 59.4% 2 8 10 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
33 2015 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2014 3 9 12 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
34 2015 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 2016 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
36 2017 0 1 1 0.0%
37 2018 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 231 209 440 52.5% 98 87 185 53.0% 25 32 57 43.9% 9 11 20 45.0% 168 168 336 50.0% 120 101 221 54.3% 38 33 71 53.5% 5 5 10 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 681/701 of Jarkko Nieminen's and 625/638 of Jurgen Melzer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Jurgen Melzer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 —/— 1999 2/2 5.0 8.5 40.6% 59.2% 42.2% 56.1% 65.6% 49.1% 37.0%
19 2001 3/5 7.0 3.7 64.8% 67.0% 52.6% 38.3% 58.7% 62.1% 41.7% 2000 3/3 6.3 3.0 55.6% 64.6% 51.8% 38.5% 30.3% 59.7% 34.1%
20 2002 44/51 2.5 2.9 62.7% 65.7% 51.6% 53.5% 45.5% 60.3% 39.6% 2001 1/2 5.0 3.0 59.4% 75.4% 41.0% 60.0% 18.2% 61.5% 38.6%
21 2003 65/66 3.1 1.7 68.1% 66.3% 52.3% 58.9% 43.1% 61.2% 39.9% 2002 18/19 4.9 3.1 58.9% 72.7% 48.0% 53.1% 40.9% 62.5% 36.7%
22 2004 32/35 2.8 2.8 63.1% 67.8% 49.7% 56.3% 43.9% 60.9% 39.4% 2003 29/29 6.7 4.7 56.8% 67.4% 44.1% 58.3% 41.9% 57.1% 34.6%
23 2005 51/51 2.3 1.9 65.9% 65.2% 50.8% 61.7% 47.0% 60.4% 39.9% 2004 49/50 5.2 3.3 58.1% 72.6% 49.1% 63.9% 46.6% 62.8% 38.1%
24 2006 76/76 3.8 1.8 62.5% 70.2% 52.6% 62.4% 50.8% 63.5% 39.4% 2005 49/49 4.4 2.7 59.8% 68.4% 49.9% 58.8% 50.0% 60.8% 36.7%
25 2007 57/57 3.1 1.8 65.7% 69.8% 51.0% 55.5% 42.4% 63.2% 40.4% 2006 57/58 5.7 3.2 60.9% 69.3% 52.3% 62.2% 44.8% 62.5% 39.3%
26 2008 50/51 3.0 2.1 67.1% 65.8% 49.5% 55.0% 45.4% 60.6% 37.8% 2007 44/45 4.7 2.8 63.0% 67.4% 49.9% 58.3% 45.1% 61.2% 36.4%
27 2009 23/25 2.9 2.0 63.4% 66.4% 51.4% 57.2% 42.4% 61.1% 37.7% 2008 49/53 6.6 2.5 61.7% 71.5% 54.4% 57.6% 37.8% 65.0% 35.3%
28 2010 54/55 4.0 2.1 70.2% 70.2% 51.8% 60.6% 40.5% 64.5% 36.9% 2009 61/61 6.8 2.3 59.4% 73.4% 52.3% 58.8% 41.0% 64.9% 37.0%
29 2011 45/45 3.1 2.3 63.3% 66.7% 52.7% 51.6% 46.2% 61.2% 35.8% 2010 72/74 6.3 2.4 61.1% 72.2% 54.7% 59.9% 45.7% 65.3% 37.3%
30 2012 49/51 2.9 2.0 68.0% 67.4% 48.1% 52.4% 43.1% 61.1% 37.0% 2011 41/41 5.0 2.4 62.8% 68.9% 50.9% 51.6% 40.0% 62.1% 38.3%
31 2013 57/58 3.3 2.2 65.6% 67.4% 51.6% 58.1% 45.4% 62.0% 38.3% 2012 40/41 5.0 3.3 61.9% 69.0% 52.4% 52.4% 48.1% 62.4% 34.8%
32 2014 49/49 3.2 2.6 64.8% 69.0% 50.1% 54.1% 43.3% 62.5% 37.1% 2013 48/48 4.5 2.8 65.4% 67.2% 49.9% 56.8% 33.7% 61.1% 35.8%
33 2015 26/26 3.5 2.0 64.8% 67.0% 47.0% 58.4% 48.9% 59.9% 35.0% 2014 34/34 4.1 2.6 65.4% 67.2% 50.5% 54.5% 36.3% 61.2% 37.0%
34 —/— 2015 20/20 3.3 4.0 61.0% 67.3% 49.3% 60.5% 41.5% 60.4% 36.2%
35 —/— 2016 6/6 2.7 2.5 67.4% 66.9% 44.8% 60.6% 51.9% 59.3% 40.5%
36 —/— 2017 1/1 4.0 1.0 74.8% 56.6% 53.6% 22.2% 75.0% 55.9% 31.1%
37 —/— 2018 1/2 3.0 2.0 79.3% 72.5% 55.6% 100.0% 25.0% 69.0% 27.6%
Career 681/702 3.2 2.1 65.5% 67.7% 51.0% 57.1% 45.0% 61.8% 38.4% 625/638 5.4 2.9 61.2% 69.8% 51.0% 58.0% 42.8% 62.4% 36.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Jurgen Melzer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1495 104.9 33.3% -1.00 0–1 -0.12 1999 1518 108.7 -0.28 +0.62 0.727 43.2% 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 -0.03
19 2001 1608 123.2 +0.61 +1.71 1.100 52.3% +13 76.9% +1.38 0–1 2–0 -0.35 2000 1548 113.7 -1.47 -0.74 0.846 47.2% 22.2% -1.22 0–1 0–2 -0.26
20 2002 1703 142.5 -1.24 +1.57 0.997 50.1% -45 +40 -185 48.4% -0.13 9–7 (56%) 8–4 (67%) 107.0 -0.24 2001 1551 105.3 +1.50 -1.19 1.001 49.0% 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–3 (0%) -0.04
21 2003 1729 140.9 -0.12 +2.38 1.030 50.4% -35 +85 -165 51.1% +0.21 18–10 (64%) 9–15 (38%) 102.3 -1.19 2002 1660 130.8 +0.42 -0.51 0.980 49.6% -48 -49 50.0% -0.07 2–2 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 +0.12
22 2004 1693 138.9 -1.64 +2.77 1.010 50.2% +2 +122 50.0% +0.06 6–2 (75%) 6–8 (43%) 102.4 -0.07 2003 1583 111.1 -3.51 -2.06 0.807 46.5% -20 -56 +87 39.0% -0.66 8–3 (73%) 7–6 (54%) 104.3 +0.49
23 2005 1796 147.3 -1.48 +2.47 1.008 50.2% -4 +57 57.3% +0.28 10–9 (53%) 17–8 (68%) 105.5 -2.46 2004 1760 142.0 +0.13 +1.60 1.023 50.6% -26 -102 -105 52.7% +0.22 8–8 (50%) 10–12 (45%) 100.0 -0.06
24 2006 1790 144.5 +1.14 +1.94 1.079 51.7% +1 +35 -85 63.0% +0.77 15–14 (52%) 25–15 (63%) 102.1 +3.02 2005 1702 137.8 -0.93 +0.15 0.938 49.4% -35 +36 -24 50.0% -0.11 10–12 (45%) 8–9 (47%) 96.3 -0.88
25 2007 1815 149.2 +0.54 +3.30 1.098 51.4% +4 -52 -56 53.1% +0.26 9–10 (47%) 13–9 (59%) 100.2 +0.31 2006 1774 133.3 +0.02 +1.44 1.047 51.0% -104 +59 -110 52.9% +0.07 11–13 (46%) 13–9 (59%) 100.1 -0.50
26 2008 1751 142.7 -1.76 +1.34 0.960 49.4% +12 +26 -24 48.5% -0.11 6–8 (43%) 10–10 (50%) 95.3 +1.39 2007 1696 137.3 -1.21 +0.32 0.940 48.9% -11 +74 48.1% -0.22 9–7 (56%) 7–11 (39%) 95.6 +0.10
27 2009 1680 134.6 -1.97 +1.08 0.969 49.3% +9 48.1% -0.20 1–7 (13%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 +0.07 2008 1800 138.7 +1.21 -0.83 1.009 50.0% -22 -35 -116 52.4% +0.11 13–8 (62%) 13–15 (46%) 104.7 +0.86
28 2010 1880 148.3 +0.94 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +5 -146 -149 51.4% +0.36 10–11 (48%) 9–8 (53%) 101.8 -0.24 2009 1927 151.7 +1.63 +0.96 1.054 50.8% -29 -86 -117 55.1% +0.14 8–8 (50%) 14–8 (64%) 105.0 -1.10
29 2011 1832 150.6 -0.65 -0.67 0.921 48.7% +2 -26 -186 46.0% -0.27 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) 98.6 -2.73 2010 1986 158.2 +2.39 +1.03 1.076 51.1% -20 -6 -97 59.0% +0.57 15–7 (68%) 19–21 (48%) 104.8 +1.32
30 2012 1752 149.6 -1.35 +0.73 0.950 49.5% +56 +12 -102 44.2% -0.23 7–5 (58%) 11–11 (50%) 100.4 -0.02 2011 1797 152.8 -0.17 +0.99 1.011 50.3% +17 +143 +139 52.0% +0.28 4–6 (40%) 6–7 (46%) 95.7 +1.81
31 2013 1795 155.2 -1.06 +2.01 1.008 50.4% +6 +18 -185 51.0% +0.23 14–10 (58%) 14–12 (54%) 101.6 -0.63 2012 1755 145.9 -0.78 -0.89 0.925 48.7% +20 +103 +111 44.8% -0.47 9–7 (56%) 13–7 (65%) 102.7 +1.18
32 2014 1765 141.8 -1.21 +0.74 0.990 49.9% -22 -29 -99 47.4% -0.17 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) 98.5 -0.46 2013 1827 141.2 -1.23 -0.76 0.919 48.3% +22 -130 +72 47.5% -0.28 10–6 (63%) 8–10 (44%) 101.5 +2.36
33 2015 1692 136.3 -2.79 -0.68 0.873 47.9% +14 -6 +35 39.1% -0.68 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 93.9 +0.18 2014 1757 141.1 -1.73 +1.12 0.955 49.1% +3 -5 +127 41.2% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 7–10 (41%) 98.0 -1.34
34 2015 1750 127.3 -2.36 -0.42 0.914 48.8% +47 -54 44.7% -0.40 1–1 5–8 (38%) -0.22
35 2016 1770 130.7 -0.27 +1.24 0.995 50.5% +16 -37 60.0% +0.13 0–3 (0%) 1–1 -0.56
36 2017 1732 123.5 +3.00 +7.41 0.704 43.9% 25.0% -1.75 -0.44
37 2018 1708 119.9 -1.35 +6.34 0.890 49.7% 100.0% +1.50 1–0 -0.15
38 2019 1689 101.7
Career 1921 151.5 -0.65 +1.56 1.005 50.2% 0 +14 -108 51.2% +0.11 126–118 (52%) 157–133 (54%) 102.3 -0.51 2017 147.6 -0.10 +0.36 0.981 49.7% -14 -4 -12 50.4% -0.03 116–99 (54%) 134–143 (48%) 100.2 +0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.