H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Marcelo Rios H2H: 1-0

Jarkko Nieminen holds a 1–0 lead over Marcelo Rios in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jarkko Nieminen leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2002 Moscow round of 32 7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 45 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Marcelo Rios
CHI Age 50 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jarkko Nieminen #35 7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(4) Marcelo Rios #25 Match data Oct 3, 2002* R32 Moscow ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,920 363 339 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Marcelo Rios #994 #1 3,719 2,129 366 180 67.0% 0 5 1 2 10 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Marcelo Rios
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 1994 12–11 52.2% #107 1,615 0 0
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 1995 38–20 65.5% #25 1,770 0 3
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 1996 52–25 67.5% #11 1,837 0 4
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,729 0 0 1997 54–26 67.5% #10 1,869 0 5
22 2004 18–17 51.4% #77 1,692 0 0 1998 66–18 78.6% #2 1,963 0 12
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,795 0 0 1999 45–16 73.8% #9 1,918 0 15
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,790 0 1 2000 28–20 58.3% #37 1,796 0 16
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,815 0 1 2001 28–19 59.6% #39 1,839 0 18
26 2008 24–27 47.1% #37 1,751 0 1 2002 31–19 62.0% #24 1,820 0 18
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,679 0 1 2003 12–6 66.7% #105 1,822 0 18
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,880 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,832 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2012 24–27 47.1% #41 1,752 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2013 31–27 53.4% #39 1,794 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2014 23–26 46.9% #73 1,764 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,691 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Marcelo Rios
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — — — — —
19 2001 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 8 8 16 50.0% 24 9 33 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 1 6 83.3%
20 2002 10 14 24 41.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 18 10 28 64.3% 28 10 38 73.7% — — — — 6 5 11 54.5%
21 2003 15 15 30 50.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1997 23 11 34 67.6% 23 9 32 71.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
22 2004 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 33 9 42 78.6% 23 5 28 82.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
23 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1999 20 8 28 71.4% 25 7 32 78.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2006 28 14 42 66.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2007 20 17 37 54.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2001 23 11 34 67.6% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — —
26 2008 17 18 35 48.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 25 11 36 69.4% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2009 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 6 3 9 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 22 16 38 57.9% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 17 16 33 51.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 21 18 39 53.8% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 14 15 29 48.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 231 209 440 52.5% 98 87 185 53.0% 25 32 57 43.9% 9 11 20 45.0% — 172 84 256 67.2% 164 74 238 68.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 26 16 42 61.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 681/701 of Jarkko Nieminen's and 466/546 of Marcelo Rios's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Marcelo Rios
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 20/23 3.7 2.1 60.5% 65.5% 52.6% 49.4% 48.5% 60.1% 41.2%
19 2001 3/5 7.0 3.7 64.8% 67.0% 52.6% 38.3% 58.7% 62.1% 41.7% 1995 55/58 3.1 2.0 62.5% 69.4% 55.4% 59.3% 44.6% 64.1% 40.7%
20 2002 44/51 2.5 2.9 62.7% 65.7% 51.6% 53.5% 45.5% 60.3% 39.6% 1996 69/77 4.3 2.7 52.3% 73.2% 53.0% 54.8% 48.7% 63.5% 40.2%
21 2003 65/66 3.1 1.7 68.1% 66.3% 52.3% 58.9% 43.1% 61.2% 39.9% 1997 62/80 5.2 3.1 54.3% 71.9% 53.9% 58.8% 43.0% 63.7% 40.0%
22 2004 32/35 2.8 2.8 63.1% 67.8% 49.7% 56.3% 43.9% 60.9% 39.4% 1998 69/84 4.8 2.1 59.2% 76.8% 57.1% 63.8% 47.6% 68.7% 44.8%
23 2005 51/51 2.3 1.9 65.9% 65.2% 50.8% 61.7% 47.0% 60.4% 39.9% 1999 51/61 3.8 3.6 55.5% 70.9% 53.9% 56.5% 43.7% 63.2% 42.0%
24 2006 76/76 3.8 1.8 62.5% 70.2% 52.6% 62.4% 50.8% 63.5% 39.4% 2000 43/48 6.1 3.8 55.1% 72.7% 53.6% 62.1% 42.8% 64.1% 39.2%
25 2007 57/57 3.1 1.8 65.7% 69.8% 51.0% 55.5% 42.4% 63.2% 40.4% 2001 39/47 5.2 3.2 58.4% 72.0% 51.3% 60.6% 48.9% 63.3% 40.2%
26 2008 50/51 3.0 2.1 67.1% 65.8% 49.5% 55.0% 45.4% 60.6% 37.8% 2002 41/50 5.9 2.9 60.8% 70.2% 51.2% 59.0% 50.6% 62.7% 38.1%
27 2009 23/25 2.9 2.0 63.4% 66.4% 51.4% 57.2% 42.4% 61.1% 37.7% 2003 17/18 3.5 2.1 65.0% 73.6% 52.4% 56.3% 39.8% 66.5% 44.1%
28 2010 54/55 4.0 2.1 70.2% 70.2% 51.8% 60.6% 40.5% 64.5% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 45/45 3.1 2.3 63.3% 66.7% 52.7% 51.6% 46.2% 61.2% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 49/51 2.9 2.0 68.0% 67.4% 48.1% 52.4% 43.1% 61.1% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 57/58 3.3 2.2 65.6% 67.4% 51.6% 58.1% 45.4% 62.0% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 49/49 3.2 2.6 64.8% 69.0% 50.1% 54.1% 43.3% 62.5% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 26/26 3.5 2.0 64.8% 67.0% 47.0% 58.4% 48.9% 59.9% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 681/702 3.2 2.1 65.5% 67.7% 51.0% 57.1% 45.0% 61.8% 38.4% — 466/546 4.6 2.8 57.5% 72.1% 53.8% 58.7% 46.1% 64.3% 41.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Marcelo Rios
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1495 104.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.12 1994 1616 137.6 +0.45 +1.49 1.032 50.6% -52 +21 — 55.0% +0.22 3–7 (30%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -0.43
19 2001 1608 123.2 +0.61 +1.71 1.100 52.3% +13 — — 76.9% +1.38 0–1 2–0 — -0.35 1995 1771 143.6 +2.61 +2.16 1.134 52.1% -64 +64 -204 62.1% +0.70 11–6 (65%) 15–7 (68%) 108.6 +0.33
20 2002 1703 142.5 -1.24 +1.57 0.997 50.1% -45 +40 -185 48.4% -0.13 9–7 (56%) 8–4 (67%) 107.0 -0.24 1996 1838 152.6 +2.05 +2.33 1.101 51.6% -34 +60 — 61.9% +0.60 14–6 (70%) 18–8 (69%) 109.0 +2.50
21 2003 1729 140.9 -0.12 +2.38 1.030 50.4% -35 +85 -165 51.1% +0.21 18–10 (64%) 9–15 (38%) 102.3 -1.19 1997 1870 152.1 +2.50 +1.54 1.103 51.7% +18 +34 -203 62.1% +0.79 18–8 (69%) 16–20 (44%) 100.2 +2.15
22 2004 1693 138.9 -1.64 +2.77 1.010 50.2% +2 +122 — 50.0% +0.06 6–2 (75%) 6–8 (43%) 102.4 -0.07 1998 1963 161.2 +5.86 +6.49 1.429 55.9% +47 +47 — 74.9% +1.61 6–7 (46%) 13–6 (68%) 97.5 +0.31
23 2005 1796 147.3 -1.48 +2.47 1.008 50.2% -4 +57 — 57.3% +0.28 10–9 (53%) 17–8 (68%) 105.5 -2.46 1999 1918 149.7 +1.16 +3.33 1.141 52.4% +10 +119 — 68.0% +0.95 13–3 (81%) 15–9 (63%) 104.6 +0.91
24 2006 1790 144.5 +1.14 +1.94 1.079 51.7% +1 +35 -85 63.0% +0.77 15–14 (52%) 25–15 (63%) 102.1 +3.02 2000 1797 147.3 +2.03 +1.16 1.090 51.4% +20 +166 — 61.5% +0.77 7–9 (44%) 15–10 (60%) 97.2 -0.74
25 2007 1815 149.2 +0.54 +3.30 1.098 51.4% +4 -52 -56 53.1% +0.26 9–10 (47%) 13–9 (59%) 100.2 +0.31 2001 1839 143.7 +1.20 +2.08 1.095 51.6% +26 -19 — 57.9% +0.52 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 100.3 -0.04
26 2008 1751 142.7 -1.76 +1.34 0.960 49.4% +12 +26 -24 48.5% -0.11 6–8 (43%) 10–10 (50%) 95.3 +1.39 2002 1820 149.1 +0.99 +1.31 1.023 50.6% +48 -37 — 63.5% +0.74 7–5 (58%) 14–10 (58%) 101.6 +0.28
27 2009 1680 134.6 -1.97 +1.08 0.969 49.3% +9 — — 48.1% -0.20 1–7 (13%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 +0.07 2003 1823 138.3 +2.95 +4.36 1.313 55.0% +78 -41 — 69.7% +1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 103.5 +0.79
28 2010 1880 148.3 +0.94 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +5 -146 -149 51.4% +0.36 10–11 (48%) 9–8 (53%) 101.8 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1832 150.6 -0.65 -0.67 0.921 48.7% +2 -26 -186 46.0% -0.27 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) 98.6 -2.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1752 149.6 -1.35 +0.73 0.950 49.5% +56 +12 -102 44.2% -0.23 7–5 (58%) 11–11 (50%) 100.4 -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1795 155.2 -1.06 +2.01 1.008 50.4% +6 +18 -185 51.0% +0.23 14–10 (58%) 14–12 (54%) 101.6 -0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1765 141.8 -1.21 +0.74 0.990 49.9% -22 -29 -99 47.4% -0.17 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) 98.5 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1692 136.3 -2.79 -0.68 0.873 47.9% +14 -6 +35 39.1% -0.68 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 93.9 +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1921 151.5 -0.65 +1.56 1.005 50.2% 0 +14 -108 51.2% +0.11 126–118 (52%) 157–133 (54%) 102.3 -0.51 — 2130 155.6 +2.44 +2.75 1.148 52.4% +15 +57 -203 64.3% +0.85 88–58 (60%) 121–76 (61%) 107.0 +1.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.