H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Marcos Daniel H2H: 1-0

Jarkko Nieminen holds a 1–0 lead over Marcos Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jarkko Nieminen leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2006 Wimbledon round of 128 6-2 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 45 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Marcos Daniel
BRA Age 48 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jarkko Nieminen #18 6-2 6-4 7-5 Marcos Daniel #80 Match data Jun 28, 2006* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,920 363 339 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Marcos Daniel #904 #56 942 1,645 20 64 23.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Marcos Daniel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,729 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2004 18–17 51.4% #77 1,692 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,795 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #236 1,485 0 0
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,790 0 1 2003 1–3 25.0% #169 1,504 0 0
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,815 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2008 24–27 47.1% #37 1,751 0 1 2005 0–2 0.0% #94 1,520 0 0
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,679 0 1 2006 5–16 23.8% #165 1,445 0 0
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,880 0 1 2007 0–2 0.0% #118 1,517 0 0
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,832 0 1 2008 6–15 28.6% #87 1,509 0 0
30 2012 24–27 47.1% #41 1,752 0 2 2009 6–12 33.3% #87 1,602 0 0
31 2013 31–27 53.4% #39 1,794 0 2 2010 2–10 16.7% #96 1,498 0 0
32 2014 23–26 46.9% #73 1,764 0 2 2011 0–3 0.0% #904 1,484 0 0
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,691 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Marcos Daniel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 10 14 24 41.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 15 15 30 50.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2006 28 14 42 66.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2007 20 17 37 54.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 17 18 35 48.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2009 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 0 5 5 0.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2010 22 16 38 57.9% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2007 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2011 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 0 5 5 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2012 17 16 33 51.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2009 1 5 6 16.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2013 21 18 39 53.8% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2014 14 15 29 48.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2015 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 231 209 440 52.5% 98 87 185 53.0% 25 32 57 43.9% 9 11 20 45.0% — 1 23 24 4.2% 18 35 53 34.0% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 681/701 of Jarkko Nieminen's and 83/84 of Marcos Daniel's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Marcos Daniel
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2001 3/5 7.0 3.7 64.8% 67.0% 52.6% 38.3% 58.7% 62.1% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 44/51 2.5 2.9 62.7% 65.7% 51.6% 53.5% 45.5% 60.3% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 65/66 3.1 1.7 68.1% 66.3% 52.3% 58.9% 43.1% 61.2% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 32/35 2.8 2.8 63.1% 67.8% 49.7% 56.3% 43.9% 60.9% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 51/51 2.3 1.9 65.9% 65.2% 50.8% 61.7% 47.0% 60.4% 39.9% 2002 1/1 2.0 1.0 49.3% 62.2% 52.6% 81.3% 100.0% 57.3% 29.1%
24 2006 76/76 3.8 1.8 62.5% 70.2% 52.6% 62.4% 50.8% 63.5% 39.4% 2003 4/4 3.3 3.0 64.4% 64.1% 42.5% 61.3% 58.8% 55.9% 34.7%
25 2007 57/57 3.1 1.8 65.7% 69.8% 51.0% 55.5% 42.4% 63.2% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 50/51 3.0 2.1 67.1% 65.8% 49.5% 55.0% 45.4% 60.6% 37.8% 2005 2/2 2.0 4.0 59.2% 60.5% 53.6% 73.1% 31.3% 57.6% 27.0%
27 2009 23/25 2.9 2.0 63.4% 66.4% 51.4% 57.2% 42.4% 61.1% 37.7% 2006 21/21 3.8 1.6 65.0% 62.3% 45.2% 43.5% 49.4% 57.0% 34.8%
28 2010 54/55 4.0 2.1 70.2% 70.2% 51.8% 60.6% 40.5% 64.5% 36.9% 2007 2/2 1.5 2.0 59.0% 59.3% 35.3% 41.4% 0.0% 49.5% 29.6%
29 2011 45/45 3.1 2.3 63.3% 66.7% 52.7% 51.6% 46.2% 61.2% 35.8% 2008 20/21 4.6 1.7 60.8% 68.3% 48.5% 58.7% 29.8% 60.7% 32.9%
30 2012 49/51 2.9 2.0 68.0% 67.4% 48.1% 52.4% 43.1% 61.1% 37.0% 2009 18/18 5.4 2.9 59.6% 68.5% 50.4% 53.1% 45.6% 61.3% 30.7%
31 2013 57/58 3.3 2.2 65.6% 67.4% 51.6% 58.1% 45.4% 62.0% 38.3% 2010 12/12 5.3 2.3 59.2% 68.8% 40.5% 54.2% 48.6% 56.6% 32.0%
32 2014 49/49 3.2 2.6 64.8% 69.0% 50.1% 54.1% 43.3% 62.5% 37.1% 2011 3/3 0.0 1.0 63.2% 39.2% 22.9% 20.0% 25.0% 32.7% 29.7%
33 2015 26/26 3.5 2.0 64.8% 67.0% 47.0% 58.4% 48.9% 59.9% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 681/702 3.2 2.1 65.5% 67.7% 51.0% 57.1% 45.0% 61.8% 38.4% — 83/84 4.3 2.1 61.4% 65.2% 45.5% 51.9% 42.3% 57.7% 32.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Marcos Daniel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1495 104.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1608 123.2 +0.61 +1.71 1.100 52.3% +13 — — 76.9% +1.38 0–1 2–0 — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1703 142.5 -1.24 +1.57 0.997 50.1% -45 +40 -185 48.4% -0.13 9–7 (56%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1729 140.9 -0.12 +2.38 1.030 50.4% -35 +85 -165 51.1% +0.21 18–10 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — -1.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1693 138.9 -1.64 +2.77 1.010 50.2% +2 +122 — 50.0% +0.06 6–2 (75%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 1796 147.3 -1.48 +2.47 1.008 50.2% -4 +57 — 57.3% +0.28 10–9 (53%) 17–8 (68%) — -2.46 2002 1485 92.6 -1.32 -3.35 0.682 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18
24 2006 1790 144.5 +1.14 +1.94 1.079 51.7% +1 +35 -85 63.0% +0.77 15–14 (52%) 25–15 (63%) — +3.02 2003 1505 109.2 -2.90 -0.82 0.787 46.9% — — — 36.4% -0.82 0–1 1–1 — -0.36
25 2007 1815 149.2 +0.54 +3.30 1.098 51.4% +4 -52 -56 53.1% +0.26 9–10 (47%) 13–9 (59%) — +0.31 2004 1500 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 1751 142.7 -1.76 +1.34 0.960 49.4% +12 +26 -24 48.5% -0.11 6–8 (43%) 10–10 (50%) — +1.39 2005 1521 115.5 +1.61 +4.56 0.637 44.2% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — 0–2 — -0.44
27 2009 1680 134.6 -1.97 +1.08 0.969 49.3% +9 — — 48.1% -0.20 1–7 (13%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.07 2006 1445 121.5 -3.69 -2.29 0.809 46.3% -8 +103 — 31.9% -1.11 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.06
28 2010 1880 148.3 +0.94 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +5 -146 -149 51.4% +0.36 10–11 (48%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.24 2007 1518 113.4 -0.91 -2.00 0.586 38.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09
29 2011 1832 150.6 -0.65 -0.67 0.921 48.7% +2 -26 -186 46.0% -0.27 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) — -2.73 2008 1510 113.6 -1.79 -3.23 0.835 47.0% -113 +95 — 31.9% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.25
30 2012 1752 149.6 -1.35 +0.73 0.950 49.5% +56 +12 -102 44.2% -0.23 7–5 (58%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.02 2009 1602 132.8 -1.64 -3.70 0.794 46.6% -199 +110 — 31.7% -1.20 1–1 4–1 (80%) — -0.60
31 2013 1795 155.2 -1.06 +2.01 1.008 50.4% +6 +18 -185 51.0% +0.23 14–10 (58%) 14–12 (54%) — -0.63 2010 1499 111.5 -3.07 -3.09 0.739 45.5% -106 +119 -65 26.7% -1.43 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.32
32 2014 1765 141.8 -1.21 +0.74 0.990 49.9% -22 -29 -99 47.4% -0.17 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) — -0.46 2011 1485 99.5 -5.19 -0.62 0.441 32.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.23
33 2015 1692 136.3 -2.79 -0.68 0.873 47.9% +14 -6 +35 39.1% -0.68 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1921 151.5 -0.65 +1.56 1.005 50.2% 0 +14 -108 51.2% +0.11 126–118 (52%) 157–133 (54%) 102.3 -0.51 — 1646 121.4 -2.49 -2.65 0.767 45.7% -111 +104 -65 29.1% -1.30 3–12 (20%) 11–11 (50%) 94.2 -1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.