H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jarkko Nieminen vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 3-1
Jarkko Nieminen holds a 3–1 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2014 Roland Garros first round 6-7(7) 6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-7(7) 6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
| Oct 30, 2013* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Michal Przysiezny | 6-3 7-6(6) | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2013* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2011* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jarkko Nieminen | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |