H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 0-1

Pablo Cuevas holds a 1–0 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pablo Cuevas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pablo Cuevas won the 2015 Indian Wells Open second round 4-6 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 45 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Pablo Cuevas
URU Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pablo Cuevas #23 4-6 7-5 6-0 Jarkko Nieminen #70 Match data Mar 15, 2015* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,920 363 339 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Pablo Cuevas #841 #19 1,865 1,960 212 213 49.9% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Pablo Cuevas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,729 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #113 1,551 0 0
22 2004 18–17 51.4% #77 1,692 0 0 2008 8–13 38.1% #142 1,633 0 0
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,795 0 0 2009 18–15 54.5% #50 1,745 0 0
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,790 0 1 2010 20–22 47.6% #63 1,760 0 0
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,815 0 1 2011 11–13 45.8% #142 1,743 0 0
26 2008 24–27 47.1% #37 1,751 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,679 0 1 2013 2–4 33.3% #220 1,716 0 0
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,880 0 1 2014 17–12 58.6% #30 1,843 0 2
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,832 0 1 2015 28–25 52.8% #40 1,815 0 3
30 2012 24–27 47.1% #41 1,752 0 2 2016 34–23 59.6% #22 1,810 0 5
31 2013 31–27 53.4% #39 1,794 0 2 2017 20–21 48.8% #32 1,787 0 6
32 2014 23–26 46.9% #73 1,764 0 2 2018 13–14 48.1% #88 1,766 0 6
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,691 0 2 2019 22–23 48.9% #45 1,741 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #67 1,691 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 2021 9–11 45.0% #97 1,651 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2022 3–6 33.3% #269 1,654 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Pablo Cuevas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 10 14 24 41.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 15 15 30 50.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — — — — —
23 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2006 28 14 42 66.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 12 13 25 48.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2007 20 17 37 54.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — —
26 2008 17 18 35 48.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 22 16 38 57.9% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 4 5 9 44.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2015 8 13 21 38.1% 19 9 28 67.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2012 17 16 33 51.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2016 9 13 22 40.9% 21 8 29 72.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
31 2013 21 18 39 53.8% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2017 6 11 17 35.3% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — —
32 2014 14 15 29 48.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2018 4 3 7 57.1% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2015 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 18 12 30 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 3 3 6 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 231 209 440 52.5% 98 87 185 53.0% 25 32 57 43.9% 9 11 20 45.0% — 56 86 142 39.4% 149 116 265 56.2% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 681/701 of Jarkko Nieminen's and 421/425 of Pablo Cuevas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Pablo Cuevas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2001 3/5 7.0 3.7 64.8% 67.0% 52.6% 38.3% 58.7% 62.1% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 44/51 2.5 2.9 62.7% 65.7% 51.6% 53.5% 45.5% 60.3% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 65/66 3.1 1.7 68.1% 66.3% 52.3% 58.9% 43.1% 61.2% 39.9% 2007 1/1 1.0 5.0 43.6% 50.0% 40.9% 58.8% 14.3% 44.9% 34.6%
22 2004 32/35 2.8 2.8 63.1% 67.8% 49.7% 56.3% 43.9% 60.9% 39.4% 2008 21/21 4.1 1.9 59.3% 63.2% 54.4% 55.2% 37.5% 59.5% 35.1%
23 2005 51/51 2.3 1.9 65.9% 65.2% 50.8% 61.7% 47.0% 60.4% 39.9% 2009 33/33 7.5 2.2 63.6% 72.0% 51.8% 60.2% 47.4% 64.8% 34.6%
24 2006 76/76 3.8 1.8 62.5% 70.2% 52.6% 62.4% 50.8% 63.5% 39.4% 2010 41/42 4.7 2.2 61.6% 68.2% 47.5% 50.4% 40.6% 60.3% 37.2%
25 2007 57/57 3.1 1.8 65.7% 69.8% 51.0% 55.5% 42.4% 63.2% 40.4% 2011 24/24 5.4 1.7 59.8% 72.3% 56.0% 58.0% 41.2% 65.9% 37.8%
26 2008 50/51 3.0 2.1 67.1% 65.8% 49.5% 55.0% 45.4% 60.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 23/25 2.9 2.0 63.4% 66.4% 51.4% 57.2% 42.4% 61.1% 37.7% 2013 6/6 5.8 4.0 57.6% 69.0% 46.5% 67.5% 32.5% 59.5% 31.7%
28 2010 54/55 4.0 2.1 70.2% 70.2% 51.8% 60.6% 40.5% 64.5% 36.9% 2014 29/29 5.7 3.1 60.1% 72.0% 52.7% 47.6% 37.7% 64.2% 39.5%
29 2011 45/45 3.1 2.3 63.3% 66.7% 52.7% 51.6% 46.2% 61.2% 35.8% 2015 53/53 5.8 2.8 60.5% 71.4% 52.5% 64.8% 42.6% 63.7% 37.5%
30 2012 49/51 2.9 2.0 68.0% 67.4% 48.1% 52.4% 43.1% 61.1% 37.0% 2016 55/57 7.6 2.9 60.3% 75.8% 55.2% 62.3% 42.7% 67.5% 36.5%
31 2013 57/58 3.3 2.2 65.6% 67.4% 51.6% 58.1% 45.4% 62.0% 38.3% 2017 41/41 5.3 3.6 59.0% 72.6% 51.0% 59.7% 42.4% 63.7% 36.3%
32 2014 49/49 3.2 2.6 64.8% 69.0% 50.1% 54.1% 43.3% 62.5% 37.1% 2018 27/27 6.2 3.3 60.2% 74.3% 55.2% 57.1% 37.9% 66.4% 36.6%
33 2015 26/26 3.5 2.0 64.8% 67.0% 47.0% 58.4% 48.9% 59.9% 35.0% 2019 45/45 5.5 3.0 58.9% 74.2% 52.7% 54.8% 44.8% 65.5% 36.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 17/17 5.9 3.5 60.3% 70.5% 49.4% 60.5% 33.6% 62.2% 35.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/20 4.8 2.5 68.9% 70.3% 50.2% 58.6% 43.1% 63.8% 35.6%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 8/9 2.8 1.9 66.8% 67.4% 53.2% 60.2% 47.2% 63.3% 37.4%
Career — 681/702 3.2 2.1 65.5% 67.7% 51.0% 57.1% 45.0% 61.8% 38.4% — 421/425 5.8 2.8 60.8% 71.7% 52.3% 58.1% 41.6% 64.1% 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Pablo Cuevas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1495 104.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1608 123.2 +0.61 +1.71 1.100 52.3% +13 — — 76.9% +1.38 0–1 2–0 — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1703 142.5 -1.24 +1.57 0.997 50.1% -45 +40 -185 48.4% -0.13 9–7 (56%) 8–4 (67%) 107.0 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1729 140.9 -0.12 +2.38 1.030 50.4% -35 +85 -165 51.1% +0.21 18–10 (64%) 9–15 (38%) 102.3 -1.19 2007 1551 110.8 +3.13 +0.76 0.628 39.7% — — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.20
22 2004 1693 138.9 -1.64 +2.77 1.010 50.2% +2 +122 — 50.0% +0.06 6–2 (75%) 6–8 (43%) 102.4 -0.07 2008 1633 124.3 -1.73 -1.88 0.867 47.8% +1 -44 — 37.5% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.8 -0.48
23 2005 1796 147.3 -1.48 +2.47 1.008 50.2% -4 +57 — 57.3% +0.28 10–9 (53%) 17–8 (68%) 105.5 -2.46 2009 1745 137.5 +0.89 -2.33 0.983 50.1% -71 +96 — 55.4% +0.08 6–6 (50%) 7–2 (78%) 105.5 +1.03
24 2006 1790 144.5 +1.14 +1.94 1.079 51.7% +1 +35 -85 63.0% +0.77 15–14 (52%) 25–15 (63%) 102.1 +3.02 2010 1761 136.7 -1.96 -0.08 0.937 48.6% -45 +38 — 48.9% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 15–2 (88%) 107.8 +0.76
25 2007 1815 149.2 +0.54 +3.30 1.098 51.4% +4 -52 -56 53.1% +0.26 9–10 (47%) 13–9 (59%) 100.2 +0.31 2011 1743 138.9 +2.31 +0.26 1.110 51.3% -28 +9 — 52.6% +0.12 2–7 (22%) 6–4 (60%) 96.2 -0.08
26 2008 1751 142.7 -1.76 +1.34 0.960 49.4% +12 +26 -24 48.5% -0.11 6–8 (43%) 10–10 (50%) 95.3 +1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 1680 134.6 -1.97 +1.08 0.969 49.3% +9 — — 48.1% -0.20 1–7 (13%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 +0.07 2013 1717 114.3 -1.40 -3.04 0.783 46.7% -23 — — 43.8% -1.13 1–1 1–1 — +0.05
28 2010 1880 148.3 +0.94 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +5 -146 -149 51.4% +0.36 10–11 (48%) 9–8 (53%) 101.8 -0.24 2014 1843 147.6 +0.35 +2.31 1.103 51.7% -117 +98 — 54.7% +0.27 7–6 (54%) 7–5 (58%) 104.8 +0.40
29 2011 1832 150.6 -0.65 -0.67 0.921 48.7% +2 -26 -186 46.0% -0.27 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) 98.6 -2.73 2015 1815 156.3 +0.03 +1.37 1.032 50.7% -98 +211 -198 50.7% +0.06 9–11 (45%) 10–13 (43%) 96.1 +0.40
30 2012 1752 149.6 -1.35 +0.73 0.950 49.5% +56 +12 -102 44.2% -0.23 7–5 (58%) 11–11 (50%) 100.4 -0.02 2016 1810 152.1 +3.77 +0.09 1.125 51.7% -111 +203 -133 57.5% +0.44 12–10 (55%) 19–20 (49%) 98.9 +2.40
31 2013 1795 155.2 -1.06 +2.01 1.008 50.4% +6 +18 -185 51.0% +0.23 14–10 (58%) 14–12 (54%) 101.6 -0.63 2017 1788 154.1 +0.80 -0.10 0.998 49.9% -91 +130 — 47.6% -0.14 9–7 (56%) 9–12 (43%) 100.8 +1.79
32 2014 1765 141.8 -1.21 +0.74 0.990 49.9% -22 -29 -99 47.4% -0.17 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) 98.5 -0.46 2018 1767 142.3 +1.63 +0.47 1.090 51.2% -24 +67 — 47.0% +0.24 4–4 (50%) 6–14 (30%) 93.3 +0.81
33 2015 1692 136.3 -2.79 -0.68 0.873 47.9% +14 -6 +35 39.1% -0.68 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 93.9 +0.18 2019 1741 144.0 +1.27 -0.02 1.050 50.6% -34 +106 -89 49.1% +0.03 7–8 (47%) 9–8 (53%) 97.5 +0.69
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1692 131.9 -0.42 -0.37 0.941 48.8% -54 +121 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) 96.3 -0.62
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1652 127.3 +0.69 -1.10 0.984 49.6% -2 +108 — 45.1% -0.25 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.71
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1654 112.6 +0.30 -1.95 1.017 50.8% — +63 — 41.7% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 96.3 +0.50
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1612 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1580 89.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1921 151.5 -0.65 +1.56 1.005 50.2% 0 +14 -108 51.2% +0.11 126–118 (52%) 157–133 (54%) 102.3 -0.51 — 1960 148.4 +0.77 -0.05 1.019 50.3% -70 +102 -143 49.9% -0.03 68–74 (48%) 100–95 (51%) 98.5 +1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.