H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jarkko Nieminen vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 1-0
Jarkko Nieminen holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jarkko Nieminen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2001 Stockholm semifinal 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2001* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 422 | 281 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarkko Nieminen | Thomas Enqvist | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,873 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,906 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 18 |
| 28 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,792 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,710 | 0 | 19 |
| 30 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #72 | 1,627 | 0 | 19 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 19 |
| 32 | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |