H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaume Munar vs Daniel Elahi Galan H2H: 2-1
Jaume Munar holds a 2–1 lead over Daniel Elahi Galan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jaume Munar leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Jaume Munar won the 2024 Cordoba third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 29
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Colombia
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2024* | Cordoba | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jaume Munar | 6-2 6-4 | Daniel Elahi Galan | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2022* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jaume Munar | 6-1 6-3 | Daniel Elahi Galan | Match data |
| Feb 4, 2022* | Cordoba | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Daniel Elahi Galan | 6-2 3-6 6-1 | Jaume Munar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaume Munar | #44 | #33 | 1,395 | 1,887 | 129 | 164 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Elahi Galan | #304 | #56 | 863 | 1,777 | 45 | 73 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaume Munar | Daniel Elahi Galan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #427 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #81 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #110 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #191 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #77 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #120 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #67 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #93 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #126 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |