H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaume Munar vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 0-4
Dominic Thiem holds a 4–0 lead over Jaume Munar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2020 US Open first round 7-6(6) 6-3 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 29
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2020* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 7-6(6) 6-3 (ret.) | Jaume Munar | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2020* | ATP Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | Jaume Munar | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2019* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 7-5 6-1 | Jaume Munar | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2018* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 7-6(8) 6-1 | Jaume Munar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaume Munar | #44 | #33 | 1,395 | 1,887 | 129 | 164 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaume Munar | Dominic Thiem | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #81 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2019 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2020 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #110 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2021 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #77 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 2023 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 |
| 27 | 2024 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 |