H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jaume Munar vs Mikael Ymer H2H: 2-0
Jaume Munar holds a 2–0 lead over Mikael Ymer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jaume Munar leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jaume Munar won the 2022 Umag third round 4-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 29
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Sweden
Age 27
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2022* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jaume Munar | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Mikael Ymer | Match data |
| May 27, 2021* | Parma | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jaume Munar | 6-3 7-6(5) | Mikael Ymer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaume Munar | #44 | #33 | 1,395 | 1,887 | 129 | 164 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mikael Ymer | #626 | #50 | 981 | 1,861 | 58 | 74 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaume Munar | Mikael Ymer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #596 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #497 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #255 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #81 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #94 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #110 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #77 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |