H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Javier Sanchez vs Albert Portas H2H: 2-1
Javier Sanchez holds a 2–1 lead over Albert Portas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Javier Sanchez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Portas won the 1998 Bucharest third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 1998* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Albert Portas | 6-3 6-3 | Javier Sanchez | Match data |
| Aug 27, 1997* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Javier Sanchez | 7-5 6-2 7-5 | Albert Portas | Match data |
| Aug 5, 1995* | Prague | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Javier Sanchez | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | Albert Portas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Javier Sanchez | #957 | #23 | 1,256 | 1,847 | 321 | 328 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Javier Sanchez | Albert Portas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #225 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #55 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1989 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #51 | 1,759 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #32 | 1,733 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #41 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 39–31 | 55.7% | #34 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 25–33 | 43.1% | #42 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #36 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1996 | 30–33 | 47.6% | #37 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1997 | 35–33 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1998 | 8–26 | 23.5% | #168 | 1,506 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,492 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #957 | 1,481 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |