H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Javier Sanchez vs Andres Gomez H2H: 1-3
Andres Gomez holds a 3–1 lead over Javier Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Andres Gomez leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1991 Brasilia final 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 66
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 1991* | Brasilia | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Andres Gomez | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Javier Sanchez | Match data |
| Apr 26, 1990* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Andres Gomez | 7-6 6-4 | Javier Sanchez | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1988* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Andres Gomez | 6-4 6-2 6-2 | Javier Sanchez | Match data |
| Sep 25, 1986* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Javier Sanchez | 6-4 6-4 | Andres Gomez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Javier Sanchez | #957 | #23 | 1,256 | 1,847 | 321 | 328 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Andres Gomez | #1,171 | #4 | 2,005 | 2,092 | 502 | 261 | 65.8% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Javier Sanchez | Andres Gomez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #225 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #55 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #51 | 1,759 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 51–25 | 67.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1991 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #32 | 1,733 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1992 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #41 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 60–13 | 82.2% | #5 | 2,072 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1993 | 39–31 | 55.7% | #34 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1994 | 25–33 | 43.1% | #42 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #10 | 1,898 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 1995 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #36 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #11 | 1,913 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1996 | 30–33 | 47.6% | #37 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #24 | 1,808 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 1997 | 35–33 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #17 | 1,868 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | 1998 | 8–26 | 23.5% | #168 | 1,506 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #6 | 1,726 | 1 | 20 |
| 31 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,492 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #70 | 1,722 | 1 | 21 |
| 32 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #957 | 1,481 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #179 | 1,676 | 1 | 21 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #402 | 1,606 | 1 | 21 |