H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Javier Sanchez vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-3

Cedric Pioline holds a 3–1 lead over Javier Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1999 Doha fourth round 7-6(2) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Javier Sanchez
ESP Age 58 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 8, 1999* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Cedric Pioline #18 7-6(2) 6-2 Javier Sanchez #169 Match data
May 8, 1996* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Cedric Pioline #20 6-4 6-1 Javier Sanchez #51 Match data
Feb 16, 1995* Milan ATP 250 R32 Carpet Cedric Pioline #52 6-4 6-3 Javier Sanchez #31 Match data
Aug 22, 1991* Schenectady ATP 250 R32 Hard Javier Sanchez #49 6-2 6-4 Cedric Pioline #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Javier Sanchez #957 #23 1,256 1,847 321 328 49.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Javier Sanchez Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1985 0–1 0.0% #373 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 2–1 66.7% #225 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1987 16–19 45.7% #110 1,596 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1988 16–15 51.6% #55 1,703 0 1 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1989 25–17 59.5% #51 1,759 0 2 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1990 22–23 48.9% #70 1,691 0 2 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1991 36–28 56.2% #32 1,733 0 2 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1992 33–32 50.8% #41 1,699 0 2 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1993 39–31 55.7% #34 1,766 0 2 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1994 25–33 43.1% #42 1,585 0 3 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1995 33–32 50.8% #36 1,650 0 3 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1996 30–33 47.6% #37 1,718 0 4 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 1997 35–33 51.5% #54 1,720 0 4 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 1998 8–26 23.5% #168 1,506 0 4 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 1999 1–3 25.0% #281 1,492 0 4 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2000 0–1 0.0% #957 1,481 0 4 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5