H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Javier Sanchez vs Pat Cash H2H: 0-1
Pat Cash holds a 1–0 lead over Javier Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pat Cash leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pat Cash won the 1988 Roland Garros second round 6-3 3-6 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1988* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Pat Cash | 6-3 3-6 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Javier Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Javier Sanchez | #957 | #23 | 1,256 | 1,847 | 321 | 328 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Pat Cash | #734 | #4 | 658 | 2,098 | 210 | 134 | 61.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Javier Sanchez | Pat Cash | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #225 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1987 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #10 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1988 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #55 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #67 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1989 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #51 | 1,759 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #24 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1990 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #7 | 2,022 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 1991 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #32 | 1,733 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 23–9 | 71.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 1 | 5 |
| 24 | 1992 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #41 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,927 | 1 | 5 |
| 25 | 1993 | 39–31 | 55.7% | #34 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #81 | 1,872 | 1 | 6 |
| 26 | 1994 | 25–33 | 43.1% | #42 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #108 | 1,806 | 1 | 6 |
| 27 | 1995 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #36 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #203 | 1,817 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 1996 | 30–33 | 47.6% | #37 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1997 | 35–33 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,767 | 1 | 6 |
| 30 | 1998 | 8–26 | 23.5% | #168 | 1,506 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #250 | 1,677 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,492 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,616 | 1 | 6 |
| 32 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #957 | 1,481 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #379 | 1,574 | 1 | 6 |