H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Javier Sanchez vs T. Benhabiles H2H: 2-0
Javier Sanchez holds a 2–0 lead over T. Benhabiles in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Javier Sanchez leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Javier Sanchez won the 1991 Umag fourth round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1991* | Umag | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Javier Sanchez | 6-0 6-3 | T. Benhabiles | Match data |
| May 2, 1991* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Javier Sanchez | 7-6(4) 6-4 | T. Benhabiles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Javier Sanchez | #957 | #23 | 1,256 | 1,847 | 321 | 328 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| T. Benhabiles | #1,262 | #22 | 387 | 1,767 | 69 | 105 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Javier Sanchez | T. Benhabiles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #225 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #616 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #71 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #55 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #51 | 1,759 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #32 | 1,733 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #230 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #41 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #113 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 39–31 | 55.7% | #34 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #107 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 25–33 | 43.1% | #42 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #177 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #36 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 30–33 | 47.6% | #37 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1997 | 35–33 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 8–26 | 23.5% | #168 | 1,506 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,492 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #957 | 1,481 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |