H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Javier Sanchez vs Tomas Smid H2H: 0-3
Tomas Smid holds a 3–0 lead over Javier Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1988 Gstaad third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 1988* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Smid | 6-3 7-5 | Javier Sanchez | Match data |
| Nov 27, 1987* | Itaparica | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Tomas Smid | 3-6 7-6 6-4 | Javier Sanchez | Match data |
| Sep 25, 1985* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Tomas Smid | 6-2 6-1 | Javier Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Javier Sanchez | #957 | #23 | 1,256 | 1,847 | 321 | 328 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Javier Sanchez | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #225 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #55 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #51 | 1,759 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1991 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #32 | 1,733 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1992 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #41 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1993 | 39–31 | 55.7% | #34 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1994 | 25–33 | 43.1% | #42 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1995 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #36 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1996 | 30–33 | 47.6% | #37 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1997 | 35–33 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1998 | 8–26 | 23.5% | #168 | 1,506 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,492 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #957 | 1,481 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 |