H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jean-Philippe Fleurian vs Alex Corretja H2H: 0-1
Alex Corretja holds a 1–0 lead over Jean-Philippe Fleurian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alex Corretja leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 1993 Sao Paulo fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1993* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Alex Corretja | 6-1 6-2 | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean-Philippe Fleurian | #1,024 | #37 | 645 | 1,758 | 106 | 156 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Alex Corretja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #78 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #129 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #78 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1990 | 23–29 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #223 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #106 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1994 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #158 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 |
| 31 | 1997 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #247 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 |