Jean-Philippe Fleurian
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Grabb | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 16, 1997 | H2H |
| Emilio Sanchez | 3 | 2 | 5 | Mar 14, 1995 | H2H |
| Horst Skoff | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jul 9, 1994 | H2H |
| Jaime Yzaga | 2 | 3 | 5 | Apr 7, 1994 | H2H |
| Boris Becker | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 26, 1996 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Daniel Vacek holds a 1–0 lead over Jean-Philippe Fleurian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1994 Copenhagen semifinal 6-2 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | 6-2 7-6(1) | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Match data | Mar 5, 1994* | SF | Copenhagen | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean-Philippe Fleurian | #1,024 | #37 | 645 | 1,759 | 106 | 156 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,821 | 171 | 220 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #78 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #129 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #78 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 23–29 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 23–29 | 44.2% | #71 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #223 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #106 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #96 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #158 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1997 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #247 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1987 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 23 | 1989 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1994 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% |
| 24 | 1990 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1995 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% |
| 25 | 1991 | 10 | 17 | 27 | 37.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1996 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% |
| 26 | 1992 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 27 | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 17 | 17 | 34 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% |
| 28 | 1994 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1999 | 20 | 17 | 37 | 54.1% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| 29 | 1995 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2000 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2001 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 59 | 85 | 144 | 41.0% | 27 | 44 | 71 | 38.0% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 14 | 18 | 32 | 43.8% | — | 87 | 105 | 192 | 45.3% | 22 | 42 | 64 | 34.4% | 17 | 23 | 40 | 42.5% | 45 | 50 | 95 | 47.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 133/151 of Jean-Philippe Fleurian's and 346/391 of Daniel Vacek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 4/4 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 61.6% | 71.4% | 42.5% | 43.4% | 19.0% | 59.1% | 34.1% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 32/35 | 6.8 | 4.4 | 60.0% | 72.6% | 54.6% | 58.6% | 34.4% | 65.5% | 31.8% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 49/52 | 7.0 | 5.4 | 59.5% | 74.6% | 50.5% | 56.6% | 36.0% | 65.1% | 34.7% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 50/61 | 8.1 | 4.3 | 59.9% | 75.7% | 51.4% | 61.3% | 37.4% | 65.9% | 35.7% |
| 25 | 1991 | 43/48 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 58.5% | 65.9% | 50.1% | 57.6% | 45.4% | 59.1% | 38.8% | 1996 | 48/52 | 7.3 | 5.1 | 56.7% | 76.2% | 49.0% | 53.1% | 39.3% | 64.6% | 33.5% |
| 26 | 1992 | 8/12 | 3.0 | 4.9 | 57.0% | 62.5% | 41.3% | 56.7% | 50.2% | 52.7% | 34.0% | 1997 | 41/45 | 8.2 | 6.8 | 51.8% | 76.0% | 46.0% | 59.0% | 36.2% | 61.5% | 34.9% |
| 27 | 1993 | 4/5 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 66.1% | 64.5% | 44.2% | 50.2% | 30.4% | 57.8% | 35.6% | 1998 | 46/54 | 7.0 | 5.1 | 56.6% | 74.9% | 47.3% | 61.9% | 39.4% | 62.8% | 35.5% |
| 28 | 1994 | 38/40 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 57.8% | 69.3% | 51.5% | 62.3% | 46.0% | 61.8% | 39.9% | 1999 | 50/60 | 4.7 | 4.6 | 56.5% | 70.1% | 47.7% | 64.0% | 37.1% | 60.1% | 36.2% |
| 29 | 1995 | 10/13 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 59.2% | 66.7% | 51.5% | 53.6% | 35.5% | 60.0% | 33.1% | 2000 | 15/17 | 4.2 | 5.4 | 53.6% | 64.8% | 40.6% | 42.9% | 30.9% | 53.9% | 30.4% |
| 30 | 1996 | 22/24 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 59.3% | 69.1% | 46.9% | 45.3% | 35.1% | 59.9% | 33.5% | 2001 | 9/9 | 6.8 | 3.4 | 54.2% | 67.3% | 50.2% | 50.6% | 27.2% | 59.5% | 29.2% |
| 31 | 1997 | 8/9 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 60.4% | 65.8% | 54.3% | 64.9% | 63.4% | 61.0% | 36.2% | 2002 | 2/2 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 58.4% | 71.8% | 37.5% | 45.7% | 36.5% | 57.6% | 36.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 1985 | 1473 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.7% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 1593 | 116.2 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -59 | — | 59.3% | +0.22 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.77 | 1991 | 1490 | 102.2 | -1.04 | -0.09 | 0.834 | 46.2% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -1.67 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.10 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1527 | 113.2 | — | — | — | — | +52 | -41 | — | 31.7% | -1.27 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.86 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 1491 | 114.6 | — | — | — | — | +58 | -15 | — | 37.0% | -0.74 | 1–3 (25%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | +0.53 | 1993 | 1560 | 126.4 | +2.79 | -4.51 | 0.922 | 49.1% | -2 | +9 | -4 | 41.1% | -0.61 | 3–7 (30%) | 7–9 (44%) | — | +0.29 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1639 | 132.5 | — | — | — | — | -41 | -47 | — | 53.7% | +0.27 | 3–5 (38%) | 8–7 (53%) | — | +0.40 | 1994 | 1732 | 143.4 | +3.08 | -2.24 | 0.992 | 49.9% | -14 | -131 | -90 | 47.5% | -0.12 | 12–9 (57%) | 13–15 (46%) | — | -1.41 |
| 24 | 1990 | 1618 | 136.2 | — | — | — | — | +34 | -39 | — | 47.0% | -0.13 | 8–13 (38%) | 10–13 (43%) | — | -0.54 | 1995 | 1798 | 148.9 | +3.89 | -1.17 | 1.046 | 50.7% | +14 | -171 | -195 | 48.7% | +0.03 | 10–11 (48%) | 15–18 (45%) | — | -1.99 |
| 25 | 1991 | 1585 | 131.0 | -1.30 | -0.21 | 0.948 | 49.4% | -46 | +40 | -3 | 45.5% | -0.20 | 7–10 (41%) | 5–8 (38%) | — | +0.26 | 1996 | 1692 | 140.7 | +2.32 | -3.52 | 0.945 | 49.3% | +10 | -77 | -50 | 45.5% | -0.25 | 12–11 (52%) | 14–11 (56%) | — | -2.02 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1492 | 107.3 | -3.38 | -1.76 | 0.719 | 43.9% | -10 | +59 | — | 21.9% | -1.53 | 0–4 (0%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.48 | 1997 | 1670 | 134.8 | -0.60 | -1.91 | 0.906 | 48.1% | +38 | -50 | -60 | 41.8% | -0.61 | 6–7 (46%) | 13–12 (52%) | — | -0.33 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1458 | 103.6 | -1.27 | -2.28 | 0.843 | 46.2% | — | +74 | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.38 | 1998 | 1672 | 143.3 | +0.67 | -1.11 | 0.956 | 49.4% | +16 | -20 | -40 | 48.1% | -0.21 | 6–8 (43%) | 13–10 (57%) | — | +0.31 |
| 28 | 1994 | 1584 | 134.3 | +0.12 | +0.95 | 1.044 | 51.2% | -69 | +41 | +35 | 48.9% | +0.19 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–13 (19%) | — | +1.05 | 1999 | 1741 | 133.9 | -1.09 | -1.27 | 0.909 | 48.6% | +1 | -191 | -65 | 46.2% | -0.17 | 9–4 (69%) | 7–11 (39%) | — | +0.89 |
| 29 | 1995 | 1548 | 113.0 | -1.51 | -3.23 | 0.827 | 47.0% | -13 | — | — | 29.4% | -1.06 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–6 (14%) | — | +0.15 | 2000 | 1629 | 122.6 | -4.37 | -4.38 | 0.659 | 42.4% | +53 | -125 | — | 27.5% | -2.08 | 1–2 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | -1.16 |
| 30 | 1996 | 1580 | 131.7 | -0.94 | -1.50 | 0.836 | 46.7% | +26 | — | — | 33.9% | -1.20 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | — | -0.99 | 2001 | 1595 | 122.1 | -0.70 | -2.81 | 0.721 | 45.3% | +49 | — | — | 23.8% | -1.67 | — | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.96 |
| 31 | 1997 | 1576 | 108.6 | -1.70 | -1.08 | 0.928 | 48.6% | -5 | — | +76 | 47.6% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.85 | 2002 | 1578 | 111.7 | +0.38 | -0.21 | 0.865 | 46.5% | — | — | — | 16.7% | -1.17 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.38 |
| Career | — | 1759 | 133.6 | -1.00 | -0.53 | 0.926 | 48.8% | -7 | +5 | +36 | 43.1% | -0.38 | 31–51 (38%) | 41–62 (40%) | 92.0 | +1.30 | — | 1822 | 143.7 | +1.22 | -2.21 | 0.930 | 48.9% | +12 | -96 | -70 | 44.3% | -0.37 | 59–59 (50%) | 88–91 (49%) | 102.9 | -1.71 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Grabb | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 16, 1997 | H2H |
| Emilio Sanchez | 3 | 2 | 5 | Mar 14, 1995 | H2H |
| Horst Skoff | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jul 9, 1994 | H2H |
| Jaime Yzaga | 2 | 3 | 5 | Apr 7, 1994 | H2H |
| Boris Becker | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 26, 1996 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 4 | 15 | 19 | Jan 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 0 | 10 | 10 | Jan 22, 1999 | H2H |
| Marcelo Rios | 2 | 6 | 8 | Sep 27, 2001 | H2H |
| Patrick Rafter | 1 | 5 | 6 | Jun 27, 2001 | H2H |
| Michael Stich | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 13, 1997 | H2H |