H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs Jiri Vanek H2H: 1-0

Jeff Tarango holds a 1–0 lead over Jiri Vanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 2000 Atlanta quarterfinal 7-6(3) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jiri Vanek
CZE Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeff Tarango #74 7-6(3) 6-2 Jiri Vanek #101 Match data Apr 15, 2000* QF Atlanta ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jiri Vanek #1,543 #74 796 1,646 68 122 35.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeff Tarango Jiri Vanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% #495 1,506 0 0
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0 2000 12–13 48.0% #77 1,591 0 0
23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 2001 11–22 33.3% #102 1,534 0 0
24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2 2002 2–4 33.3% #199 1,532 0 0
25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2 2003 7–9 43.8% #143 1,545 0 0
26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2 2004 4–7 36.4% #115 1,533 0 0
27 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2 2005 7–18 28.0% #99 1,500 0 0
28 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2 2006 10–17 37.0% #102 1,552 0 0
29 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 2007 7–13 35.0% #101 1,578 0 0
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 2008 7–16 30.4% #124 1,563 0 0
31 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2 2009 0–2 0.0% #175 1,577 0 0
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jeff Tarango Jiri Vanek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2001 3 9 12 25.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2005 1 3 4 25.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2007 2 5 7 28.6% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2008 1 6 7 14.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1% — 18 42 60 30.0% 48 66 114 42.1% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 411/468 of Jeff Tarango's and 180/190 of Jiri Vanek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jeff Tarango Jiri Vanek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 2/2 2.5 2.0 43.3% 49.4% 41.6% 39.2% 61.4% 44.6% 46.6%
22 1991 32/39 1.9 5.1 65.8% 64.8% 46.6% 56.0% 48.7% 58.5% 37.0% 2000 22/25 6.0 3.5 55.1% 69.7% 47.3% 55.9% 43.2% 59.7% 36.5%
23 1992 47/52 3.5 3.5 63.1% 67.5% 47.8% 56.6% 42.3% 60.3% 38.7% 2001 29/33 5.4 2.2 54.5% 69.6% 45.8% 54.7% 42.3% 58.4% 36.3%
24 1993 43/50 3.7 4.6 56.6% 68.4% 47.0% 59.2% 45.1% 59.1% 38.5% 2002 5/6 5.4 1.6 56.8% 70.1% 51.4% 61.4% 54.2% 62.0% 33.9%
25 1994 40/50 3.6 2.2 62.1% 65.8% 51.8% 56.4% 46.6% 60.6% 39.0% 2003 16/16 7.2 2.5 56.4% 71.8% 48.8% 56.9% 51.0% 61.8% 35.2%
26 1995 38/42 4.2 3.7 62.9% 70.3% 49.3% 54.4% 44.8% 62.3% 37.0% 2004 11/11 5.5 3.0 57.3% 69.9% 43.5% 65.1% 34.7% 58.5% 36.3%
27 1996 28/32 5.2 3.2 61.9% 68.0% 50.2% 54.3% 39.3% 61.4% 38.0% 2005 25/25 7.3 3.4 60.4% 69.7% 42.7% 57.6% 34.8% 58.9% 33.4%
28 1997 54/60 3.8 3.5 62.3% 69.2% 51.5% 52.2% 45.0% 62.3% 38.9% 2006 27/27 4.4 3.2 65.9% 65.9% 42.1% 57.7% 46.3% 57.8% 37.9%
29 1998 47/53 4.0 4.2 57.7% 67.9% 52.0% 51.3% 46.8% 61.1% 40.1% 2007 20/20 5.8 2.7 61.0% 69.1% 44.6% 52.0% 44.1% 59.5% 33.2%
30 1999 42/45 4.9 4.1 60.6% 67.1% 46.1% 61.0% 43.2% 58.9% 38.4% 2008 21/23 6.0 3.2 58.6% 67.1% 43.2% 57.4% 44.1% 57.2% 33.6%
31 2000 33/36 4.6 5.3 58.1% 68.9% 47.5% 56.9% 42.2% 60.1% 36.0% 2009 2/2 4.0 6.5 52.9% 63.0% 36.1% 58.0% 25.0% 50.6% 18.6%
32 2001 7/9 3.3 2.1 62.4% 61.8% 52.7% 53.7% 51.2% 58.4% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 411/534 3.9 3.9 61.0% 67.8% 49.2% 55.7% 44.6% 60.5% 38.2% — 180/190 5.8 3.0 58.6% 68.6% 44.7% 56.6% 43.0% 58.7% 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jeff Tarango Jiri Vanek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1506 98.4 -2.42 +0.35 0.841 45.6% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — +0.19
18 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07 2000 1592 125.0 -1.75 -0.49 0.907 48.7% -27 +29 — 45.6% -0.15 5–5 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.43
23 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21 2001 1534 129.4 -2.36 -1.10 0.873 47.5% -15 +85 — 39.0% -0.76 2–7 (22%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.01
24 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60 2002 1533 112.7 +0.13 -0.05 0.893 48.7% -3 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — +0.05
25 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47 2003 1546 123.4 -0.16 -1.98 0.920 48.6% -35 +88 — 44.7% -0.53 2–3 (40%) 7–2 (78%) — -0.28
26 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34 2004 1534 107.9 -1.90 -0.97 0.873 47.3% -3 +73 — 41.4% -0.90 3–4 (43%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.51
27 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93 2005 1501 112.6 -2.39 -3.28 0.814 46.3% -3 +44 — 30.2% -1.19 5–4 (56%) 4–12 (25%) — -0.01
28 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45 2006 1552 124.5 -2.92 -0.30 0.898 48.0% -20 +4 -48 41.5% -0.51 1–6 (14%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.18
29 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03 2007 1578 121.4 -2.67 -1.97 0.819 46.9% -83 +67 — 36.2% -1.04 3–4 (43%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.50
30 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16 2008 1564 117.1 -3.67 -2.26 0.786 46.0% -66 +59 — 35.9% -1.23 4–5 (44%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.23
31 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28 2009 1577 111.7 -3.01 +0.23 0.377 37.8% — — — 0.0% -3.60 — — — -0.30
32 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01 2010 1548 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38 — 1647 125.9 -2.28 -1.45 0.854 47.3% -30 +52 -48 38.7% -0.82 27–39 (41%) 41–42 (49%) 100.0 +0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.