H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Jeremy Chardy vs Bjorn Phau H2H: 1-2

Bjorn Phau holds a 2–1 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Bjorn Phau leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jeremy Chardy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bjorn Phau won the 2013 Indian Wells Open second round 6-2 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Bjorn Phau
GER Age 46 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bjorn Phau #121 6-2 2-6 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #25 Match data Mar 10, 2013* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jeremy Chardy #51 6-2 7-5 Bjorn Phau #112 Match data Apr 7, 2011* R32 Casablanca ATP 250 Clay
Bjorn Phau #126 6-3 6-1 Jeremy Chardy #42 Match data Feb 11, 2010* R32 San Jose ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Bjorn Phau #1,098 #59 1,038 1,733 80 138 36.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeremy Chardy Bjorn Phau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
19 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0 1999 3–2 60.0% #323 1,541 0 0
20 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0 2000 0–4 0.0% #208 1,519 0 0
21 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0 2001 2–4 33.3% #183 1,578 0 0
22 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1 2002 1–6 14.3% #148 1,503 0 0
23 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1 2003 1–4 20.0% #158 1,519 0 0
24 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1 2004 5–4 55.6% #136 1,548 0 0
25 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1 2005 10–14 41.7% #87 1,635 0 0
26 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1 2006 16–26 38.1% #77 1,533 0 0
27 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1 2007 4–10 28.6% #183 1,562 0 0
28 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1 2008 3–4 42.9% #120 1,664 0 0
29 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1 2009 12–17 41.4% #111 1,655 0 0
30 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1 2010 9–13 40.9% #102 1,619 0 0
31 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1 2011 2–7 22.2% #156 1,610 0 0
32 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1 2012 7–14 33.3% #75 1,656 0 0
33 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1 2013 2–6 25.0% #316 1,641 0 0
34 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1 2014 3–2 60.0% #371 1,691 0 0
36 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jeremy Chardy Bjorn Phau
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2002 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 9 7 16 56.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2006 10 15 25 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2007 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 8 9 17 47.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2010 4 7 11 36.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2012 2 7 9 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0% — — — — — 56 84 140 40.0% 22 37 59 37.3% 1 13 14 7.1% 1 4 5 20.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's and 218/218 of Bjorn Phau's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jeremy Chardy Bjorn Phau
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 1/1 1.0 4.0 40.0% 65.0% 46.7% 50.0% 0.0% 54.0% 27.1%
19 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3% 1999 5/5 1.6 3.4 53.4% 54.5% 54.4% 45.3% 49.6% 54.6% 40.9%
20 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3% 2000 4/4 1.8 1.8 52.8% 62.8% 40.8% 51.8% 7.1% 52.3% 31.3%
21 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6% 2001 6/6 4.3 4.7 52.5% 63.3% 42.9% 53.9% 45.2% 52.9% 34.4%
22 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5% 2002 7/7 3.3 3.7 50.6% 64.1% 46.5% 57.5% 53.4% 55.5% 38.5%
23 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9% 2003 5/5 4.2 3.4 51.3% 66.4% 48.3% 40.4% 41.4% 57.3% 34.3%
24 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1% 2004 9/9 4.9 2.9 53.1% 76.7% 51.5% 55.8% 62.4% 64.6% 43.2%
25 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0% 2005 24/24 4.4 3.6 52.4% 68.8% 50.4% 55.0% 41.3% 60.2% 37.5%
26 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8% 2006 42/42 3.4 2.9 51.9% 68.0% 50.8% 54.4% 41.0% 59.6% 36.1%
27 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5% 2007 14/14 4.4 4.5 52.7% 66.7% 47.4% 56.2% 35.8% 57.5% 37.3%
28 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6% 2008 7/7 3.9 3.9 50.2% 70.9% 51.4% 56.7% 30.1% 61.5% 32.3%
29 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8% 2009 29/29 3.4 3.5 51.7% 69.1% 50.6% 51.6% 50.1% 60.2% 37.6%
30 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1% 2010 22/22 3.6 4.0 55.2% 69.2% 52.9% 65.0% 39.2% 62.1% 39.4%
31 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3% 2011 9/9 2.4 3.6 59.3% 63.5% 43.7% 41.9% 48.6% 55.1% 33.8%
32 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6% 2012 21/21 4.6 4.5 52.9% 66.9% 45.4% 55.4% 44.1% 56.9% 37.0%
33 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3% 2013 8/8 2.9 2.3 53.6% 65.2% 46.5% 35.9% 31.1% 57.5% 32.5%
34 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9% 2014 5/5 3.0 3.2 54.6% 69.7% 55.1% 58.5% 44.1% 63.0% 39.6%
36 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2% — 218/218 3.7 3.5 52.8% 67.6% 49.4% 53.9% 42.5% 59.0% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jeremy Chardy Bjorn Phau
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1489 97.1 -0.67 +0.23 0.589 40.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.07
19 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22 1999 1541 117.3 -2.26 +2.33 0.900 48.3% +18 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 — — -0.05
20 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03 2000 1520 113.1 -1.19 -2.11 0.655 41.9% — — — 10.0% -2.90 — — — -0.11
21 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) 104.0 -0.36 2001 1579 109.7 -1.56 -0.62 0.730 44.0% +30 — — 41.2% -1.53 0–2 1–0 — -0.29
22 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) 108.8 -2.59 2002 1503 105.9 -2.35 -0.97 0.866 47.0% +44 +21 — 25.0% -1.31 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
23 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 105.6 -2.43 2003 1520 108.8 -1.25 -1.61 0.802 46.1% +50 — — 23.1% -1.23 1–1 3–4 (43%) — +0.04
24 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) 93.3 -0.53 2004 1549 112.6 +0.11 +2.06 1.218 53.5% +29 — — 54.5% +0.64 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.81
25 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 101.5 +1.81 2005 1636 123.8 -2.04 +0.30 0.941 49.1% +33 -116 -171 45.2% -0.40 2–3 (40%) 5–7 (42%) 97.1 -0.35
26 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 99.8 +2.11 2006 1534 119.1 -2.65 -1.24 0.895 47.8% +35 +14 -125 39.0% -0.89 4–6 (40%) 6–6 (50%) 99.5 +2.39
27 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) 102.1 +0.64 2007 1562 125.0 -3.80 +0.33 0.876 47.5% +27 — — 35.1% -0.97 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 96.1 +0.14
28 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) 97.1 -0.92 2008 1664 123.3 +0.19 -0.03 0.839 47.4% -2 — — 38.9% -0.67 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.3 -0.93
29 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) 91.1 +2.28 2009 1655 122.5 -2.48 +0.31 0.945 48.9% +37 -87 -225 39.1% -0.64 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 102.3 +1.24
30 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 100.7 -1.26 2010 1620 123.4 -0.86 +1.49 1.040 50.9% +12 +26 — 39.6% -0.31 2–2 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 95.9 +1.70
31 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) 106.3 -1.20 2011 1610 120.1 -4.07 -0.27 0.753 44.3% -4 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.67
32 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) 98.6 -2.48 2012 1656 129.8 -3.82 +0.05 0.858 46.9% -5 -6 -210 36.4% -1.29 1–5 (17%) 4–4 (50%) 96.6 -0.64
33 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08 2013 1642 127.4 -2.35 -2.12 0.765 44.5% +25 — — 26.3% -1.74 1–1 1–1 — -0.28
34 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) 106.9 -2.92 2014 1691 122.4 -0.28 +0.27 1.071 51.0% +37 — — 54.5% +0.46 1–0 — — +0.15
36 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59 — 1734 127.9 -2.24 -0.06 0.902 48.0% +26 -14 -183 38.2% -0.83 24–34 (41%) 31–41 (43%) 95.8 +1.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.