H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jeremy Chardy vs Daniel Cox H2H: 1-0

Jeremy Chardy holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Cox in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jeremy Chardy leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2014 Wimbledon first round 6-2 7-6(3) 6-7(6) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Cox
GBR Age 35 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeremy Chardy #42 6-2 7-6(3) 6-7(6) 6-3 Daniel Cox #214 Match data Jun 25, 2014* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Daniel Cox #1,462 #206 240 1,517 0 5 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeremy Chardy Daniel Cox
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0 2011 0–3 0.0% #401 1,464 0 0
21 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1 2014 0–2 0.0% #303 1,490 0 0
24 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jeremy Chardy Daniel Cox
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
21 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2014 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0% — — — — — — — — — 0 5 5 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's and 5/5 of Daniel Cox's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jeremy Chardy Daniel Cox
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3% 2011 3/3 2.3 5.0 59.3% 60.3% 50.9% 58.9% 0.0% 56.5% 24.1%
21 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9% 2014 2/2 8.0 4.5 63.5% 61.5% 45.7% 48.2% 50.0% 55.9% 30.9%
24 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2% — 5/5 4.6 4.8 61.0% 60.7% 48.8% 54.6% 20.0% 56.3% 26.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jeremy Chardy Daniel Cox
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1482 90.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1496 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1480 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22 2010 1495 100.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03 2011 1464 93.1 -1.71 -2.88 0.553 41.5% — — +27 0.0% -3.29 — — — +0.31
21 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) — -0.36 2012 1465 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) — -2.59 2013 1499 102.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.43 2014 1490 102.8 -1.06 -0.72 0.701 44.0% — — — 16.7% -2.17 — 1–1 — -0.03
24 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.53 2015 1473 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) — +1.81 2016 1492 107.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) — +2.11 2017 1475 96.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) — +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) — -0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) — +2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.20 2022 1467 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) — -2.48 2023 1452 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) — -2.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59 — 1518 97.7 -1.45 -2.02 0.613 42.5% — — +27 7.7% -2.77 — 1–1 — +5.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.