H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jeremy Chardy vs Di Wu H2H: 0-1
Di Wu holds a 1–0 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Di Wu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Di Wu won the 2017 Shanghai Masters second round 7-6(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2017* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Di Wu | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Chardy | #1,077 | #25 | 1,486 | 1,968 | 290 | 303 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Di Wu | #1,143 | #140 | 409 | 1,555 | 4 | 20 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jeremy Chardy | Di Wu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #32 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #45 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #103 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #34 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #244 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,896 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #69 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #78 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #75 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #519 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |