H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Jeremy Chardy vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 3-3

Jeremy Chardy and Ernests Gulbis are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jeremy Chardy leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Ernests Gulbis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2016 Australian Open first round 7-5 2-6 6-7(5) 6-3 13-11.

FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
LAT Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 20, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jeremy Chardy #31 7-5 2-6 6-7(5) 6-3 13-11 Ernests Gulbis #79 Match data
Feb 20, 2015* Marseille ATP 250 R16 Hard Jeremy Chardy #35 6-3 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #13 Match data
Oct 17, 2013* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Ernests Gulbis #26 6-3 3-6 7-6(3) Jeremy Chardy #36 Match data
Sep 1, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jeremy Chardy #64 6-2 7-6(1) 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #26 Match data
Apr 22, 2010* Barcelona ATP 500 R32 Clay Ernests Gulbis #44 6-3 6-2 Jeremy Chardy #46 Match data
Oct 29, 2009* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R16 Hard Ernests Gulbis #100 7-6(7) 6-3 Jeremy Chardy #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,968 290 303 48.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,139 221 232 48.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeremy Chardy Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,547 0 0 2008 22–20 52.4% #53 1,815 0 0
20 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,696 0 0
21 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,680 0 0 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,845 0 1
22 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,780 0 1 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,774 0 2
23 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,827 0 1 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,727 0 2
24 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,728 0 1 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,939 0 4
25 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,822 0 1 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,917 0 6
26 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,797 0 1 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,896 0 1 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,716 0 6
29 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,813 0 6
30 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,784 0 1 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,533 0 6
31 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,562 0 6
32 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,918 0 1 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2021 17–17 50.0% #107 1,774 0 1
36 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,718 0 1