H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Jeremy Chardy vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 3-1

Jeremy Chardy holds a 3–1 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jeremy Chardy leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2012 Indian Wells Open first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marcos Baghdatis #47 6-3 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #64 Match data Mar 10, 2012* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jeremy Chardy #59 7-6(4) 6-1 Marcos Baghdatis #18 Match data Oct 12, 2010* R64 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Jeremy Chardy #72 7-5 2-6 7-6(4) Marcos Baghdatis #20 Match data Aug 11, 2010* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jeremy Chardy #52 7-6(7) 7-6(3) Marcos Baghdatis #100 Match data Feb 28, 2009* QF Delray Beach Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 327 274 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeremy Chardy Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0 2004 2–2 50.0% #159 1,576 0 0
20 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,699 0 0
21 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,938 0 2
23 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,814 0 2
24 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,784 0 3
25 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,851 0 4
26 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1 2012 33–25 56.9% #36 1,908 0 4
28 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,806 0 4
29 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,704 0 4
30 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,870 0 4
31 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,728 0 4
34 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,743 0 4
36 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jeremy Chardy Marcos Baghdatis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
21 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 22 12 34 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2007 23 15 38 60.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2008 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
24 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 33 18 51 64.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 18 18 36 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
27 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2012 24 16 40 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
28 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 14 15 29 48.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2015 17 13 30 56.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
31 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2016 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — —
32 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2017 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
33 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2019 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
36 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0% — — — — — 233 182 415 56.1% 30 50 80 37.5% 55 40 95 57.9% 9 2 11 81.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's and 594/601 of Marcos Baghdatis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jeremy Chardy Marcos Baghdatis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3% 2004 2/4 11.5 7.5 51.4% 71.0% 41.1% 18.3% 61.4% 56.3% 38.1%
20 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3% 2005 23/23 7.5 2.6 56.7% 73.2% 52.6% 55.8% 51.8% 64.3% 37.5%
21 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6% 2006 53/53 7.4 3.3 52.5% 74.5% 50.5% 54.0% 44.4% 62.8% 40.2%
22 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5% 2007 66/66 6.8 2.7 52.6% 75.1% 54.2% 61.3% 46.5% 65.0% 39.2%
23 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9% 2008 24/24 8.2 3.8 54.0% 77.5% 53.3% 57.0% 35.8% 66.3% 35.2%
24 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1% 2009 33/34 7.2 3.0 52.8% 75.2% 51.2% 56.2% 43.9% 63.7% 39.4%
25 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0% 2010 68/68 7.3 2.9 51.3% 75.9% 52.1% 57.6% 43.5% 64.5% 38.6%
26 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8% 2011 53/53 7.5 2.9 51.3% 76.4% 51.0% 59.2% 46.0% 63.9% 36.7%
27 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5% 2012 55/58 6.3 3.1 54.7% 73.6% 52.4% 54.6% 43.1% 64.2% 37.9%
28 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6% 2013 36/36 7.6 4.3 53.0% 75.3% 51.9% 64.0% 39.1% 64.1% 34.4%
29 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8% 2014 18/18 6.4 4.6 52.0% 74.5% 50.3% 45.3% 45.3% 63.0% 35.2%
30 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1% 2015 45/45 7.8 3.6 54.5% 74.1% 51.1% 58.0% 45.4% 63.6% 37.6%
31 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3% 2016 49/49 6.0 3.3 52.3% 73.9% 53.6% 58.4% 43.5% 64.0% 36.9%
32 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6% 2017 34/34 7.6 3.5 52.0% 76.6% 49.9% 62.7% 39.9% 64.1% 36.3%
33 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3% 2018 28/29 9.6 3.5 56.0% 74.9% 50.9% 56.9% 37.7% 64.0% 38.1%
34 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9% 2019 7/7 5.7 4.1 55.2% 77.5% 46.0% 56.1% 43.2% 63.4% 37.0%
36 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2% — 594/601 7.3 3.3 53.0% 75.0% 51.8% 57.6% 43.6% 64.1% 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jeremy Chardy Marcos Baghdatis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1485 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22 2004 1576 118.7 -0.69 +1.61 0.871 47.4% +16 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 2–0 — -0.09
20 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03 2005 1700 138.3 +1.75 +0.83 1.048 50.7% +36 — — 49.3% +0.13 4–5 (44%) 8–8 (50%) 101.2 -0.74
21 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) 104.0 -0.36 2006 1843 151.4 +0.96 +3.30 1.081 51.5% +9 -291 -70 59.3% +0.45 11–9 (55%) 17–7 (71%) 105.9 -1.44
22 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) 108.8 -2.59 2007 1938 150.2 +2.29 +2.86 1.121 52.1% -36 -250 -59 61.7% +0.72 13–6 (68%) 18–16 (53%) 107.4 -0.34
23 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 105.6 -2.43 2008 1814 141.8 +1.75 -0.01 1.045 50.5% +1 — +137 56.3% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 7–3 (70%) 97.2 -0.74
24 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) 93.3 -0.53 2009 1785 147.9 +0.73 +2.59 1.086 51.4% +42 — +151 56.4% +0.42 1–6 (14%) 5–7 (42%) 91.3 -0.90
25 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 101.5 +1.81 2010 1852 156.2 +1.70 +2.21 1.087 51.3% +40 -122 -46 59.2% +0.51 12–11 (52%) 16–8 (67%) 103.7 -0.06
26 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 99.8 +2.11 2011 1844 157.1 +1.07 +0.51 1.016 50.4% +32 -159 +46 52.2% +0.26 8–11 (42%) 13–14 (48%) 97.1 -0.79
27 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) 102.1 +0.64 2012 1908 155.9 +1.50 +1.16 1.059 50.9% +21 -225 +14 56.4% +0.32 9–6 (60%) 13–10 (57%) 101.4 -1.33
28 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) 97.1 -0.92 2013 1806 154.0 +1.07 -0.98 0.959 49.3% +63 -182 +5 43.6% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 6–13 (32%) 86.4 -2.69
29 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) 91.1 +2.28 2014 1705 123.0 -0.60 -0.13 0.951 48.8% +34 — +84 46.8% -0.34 4–6 (40%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.23
30 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 100.7 -1.26 2015 1870 152.8 -0.76 +2.30 1.033 50.6% -3 -251 -6 56.9% +0.42 10–7 (59%) 11–9 (55%) 105.0 -0.74
31 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) 106.3 -1.20 2016 1884 158.0 +0.22 +1.50 1.027 50.2% +24 -227 -33 52.5% +0.08 6–7 (46%) 12–10 (55%) 100.2 -2.18
32 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) 98.6 -2.48 2017 1839 144.1 +0.48 -0.05 1.011 50.1% +31 -215 -34 52.1% +0.15 6–1 (86%) 6–6 (50%) 104.3 -0.55
33 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08 2018 1728 136.9 +0.05 +0.78 1.058 50.5% +55 -175 +46 43.8% -0.13 3–4 (43%) 7–8 (47%) 96.1 +0.39
34 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) 106.9 -2.92 2019 1743 122.7 -0.99 +0.40 1.010 49.8% +39 — — 50.0% -0.11 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.56
36 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59 — 1953 157.5 +0.97 +1.47 1.049 50.7% +23 -204 +4 54.6% +0.27 95–94 (50%) 147–125 (54%) 100.7 -1.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.