H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Jeremy Chardy vs Michael Venus

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Jeremy Chardy vs Michael Venus.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Michael Venus
NZL Age 38 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeremy Chardy #63 6-1 6-1 Michael Venus Match data Sep 14, 2020 Q1 Q Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Michael Venus #1,027 #274 170 1,562 1 10 9.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeremy Chardy Michael Venus
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
19 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1 2011 0–1 0.0% #379 1,433 0 0
24 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1 2012 0–1 0.0% #515 1,425 0 0
25 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1 2014 0–1 0.0% #408 1,468 0 0
27 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1 2015 1–2 33.3% #678 1,555 0 0
28 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1 2016 0–1 0.0% #1032 1,552 0 0
29 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1 2017 0–1 0.0% #1027 1,529 0 0
30 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1 2018 0–1 0.0% — 1,527 0 0
31 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1 2020 0–1 0.0% — 1,516 0 0
33 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jeremy Chardy Michael Venus
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0% — 1 9 10 10.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's and 11/11 of Michael Venus's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jeremy Chardy Michael Venus
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 5.0 2.0 47.3% 65.4% 27.6% 44.4% — 45.5% 15.2%
19 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9% 2011 1/1 7.0 8.0 56.3% 77.8% 31.4% 37.5% 100.0% 57.5% 23.4%
24 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1% 2012 1/1 4.0 1.0 52.5% 61.3% 53.6% 40.0% — 57.6% 25.5%
25 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8% 2014 1/1 10.0 3.0 55.1% 70.4% 40.9% 40.0% 0.0% 57.1% 29.1%
27 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5% 2015 3/3 10.3 3.0 57.7% 77.4% 53.6% 40.9% 30.0% 67.0% 26.1%
28 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6% 2016 1/1 3.0 2.0 59.4% 82.9% 42.9% 50.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
29 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8% 2017 1/1 8.0 3.0 59.8% 72.7% 48.6% 71.4% 14.3% 63.0% 33.3%
30 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1% 2018 1/1 3.0 3.0 42.9% 61.1% 16.7% 28.6% 16.7% 35.7% 29.4%
31 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6% 2020 1/1 2.0 3.0 55.6% 80.0% 37.5% 50.0% 33.3% 61.1% 28.1%
33 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2% — 11/11 6.6 3.1 54.7% 73.1% 41.8% 44.1% 23.1% 58.7% 26.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jeremy Chardy Michael Venus
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1486 95.2 -3.97 -0.97 0.278 34.1% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05
19 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22 2007 1470 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) — -0.36 2009 1474 102.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) — -2.59 2010 1453 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.43 2011 1433 102.0 +0.81 +0.28 0.550 40.8% — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.07
24 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.53 2012 1426 103.2 -1.39 -1.61 0.602 42.7% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06
25 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) — +1.81 2013 1413 102.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) — +2.11 2014 1469 108.6 -1.84 +2.38 0.679 42.3% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
27 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) — +0.64 2015 1555 105.0 -0.35 -3.40 0.792 46.5% — — — 28.6% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.15
28 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) — -0.92 2016 1552 107.5 +0.81 -3.90 1.000 47.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.16
29 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) — +2.28 2017 1530 106.9 -2.88 +1.93 0.902 48.6% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.14
30 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -1.26 2018 1528 105.6 +0.21 +0.63 0.458 32.3% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.18
31 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) — -2.48 2020 1516 101.3 -3.15 +0.47 0.722 44.1% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.02
33 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) — -2.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59 — 1563 108.6 -1.13 -1.00 0.650 42.9% — — — 16.0% -2.16 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -4.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.