H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jeremy Chardy vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 2-0
Jeremy Chardy holds a 2–0 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jeremy Chardy leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2009 Stuttgart semifinal 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2009* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Jeremy Chardy | 6-3 7-5 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
| May 8, 2009* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jeremy Chardy | 6-4 7-6(8) | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Chardy | #1,077 | #25 | 1,486 | 1,968 | 290 | 303 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nicolas Kiefer | #720 | #4 | 2,447 | 1,984 | 343 | 252 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jeremy Chardy | Nicolas Kiefer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,921 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2009 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #32 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,921 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #45 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2011 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #103 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #72 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2012 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2013 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #34 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #21 | 1,897 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2014 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #22 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2015 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,896 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #48 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #69 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #49 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #78 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2019 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,717 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #75 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #519 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |