H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Jeremy Chardy vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 2-0
Jeremy Chardy holds a 2–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jeremy Chardy leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2014 Wimbledon third round 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Jeremy Chardy | 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 6-0 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jeremy Chardy | 6-4 4-6 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Chardy | #1,077 | #25 | 1,486 | 1,968 | 290 | 303 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jeremy Chardy | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #32 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #45 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #103 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #34 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,896 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #69 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #78 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #75 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #519 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |