H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Jerome Golmard vs Alex Corretja H2H: 2-5

Alex Corretja holds a 5–2 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Alex Corretja leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jerome Golmard won the 2002 Hong Kong fourth round 6-3 2-6 7-6(2).

FRA Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 5
7 main draw meetings
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 27, 2002* Hong Kong ATP 250 R16 Hard Jerome Golmard #137 6-3 2-6 7-6(2) Alex Corretja #20 Match data
Aug 31, 2001* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Alex Corretja #11 7-5 7-6(4) 7-5 Jerome Golmard #47 Match data
Jun 14, 2001* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Jerome Golmard #52 6-0 6-2 Alex Corretja #9 Match data
Mar 22, 2001* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Alex Corretja #10 7-6(1) 7-6(6) Jerome Golmard #66 Match data
Oct 22, 1998* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Alex Corretja #7 7-6(4) 6-2 Jerome Golmard #57 Match data
Mar 19, 1997* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Alex Corretja #22 7-5 6-3 Jerome Golmard #104 Match data
May 31, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Alex Corretja #25 6-4 7-5 6-0 Jerome Golmard #183 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jerome Golmard #1,178 #22 1,494 1,896 141 142 49.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Alex Corretja #1,110 #2 3,550 2,002 415 277 60.0% 0 2 1 0 14 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jerome Golmard Alex Corretja
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 11–13 45.8% #86 1,566 0 0
19 1993 24–23 51.1% #76 1,658 0 0
20 1994 1–1 50.0% #208 1,514 0 0 1994 44–22 66.7% #22 1,848 0 1
21 1995 6–11 35.3% #88 1,549 0 0 1995 25–27 48.1% #48 1,714 0 1
22 1996 3–14 17.6% #143 1,423 0 0 1996 37–26 58.7% #23 1,783 0 1
23 1997 12–16 42.9% #115 1,548 0 0 1997 49–23 68.1% #12 1,822 0 4
24 1998 23–22 51.1% #47 1,716 0 0 1998 53–20 72.6% #3 1,962 0 9
25 1999 21–12 63.6% #35 1,828 0 1 1999 33–22 60.0% #26 1,771 0 9
26 2000 30–24 55.6% #42 1,755 0 2 2000 50–18 73.5% #8 1,940 0 14
27 2001 27–21 56.2% #50 1,746 0 2 2001 30–20 60.0% #16 1,781 0 15
28 2002 14–13 51.9% #99 1,699 0 2 2002 35–17 67.3% #19 1,851 0 17
29 2003 0–3 0.0% #309 1,628 0 2 2003 11–22 33.3% #100 1,650 0 17
30 2004 4–5 44.4% #211 1,662 0 2 2004 12–19 38.7% #114 1,623 0 17
31 2005 1–5 16.7% #525 1,571 0 17