H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs Davide Sanguinetti H2H: 1-0
Jerome Golmard holds a 1–0 lead over Davide Sanguinetti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jerome Golmard leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jerome Golmard won the 1999 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 1999* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jerome Golmard | 6-1 6-2 | Davide Sanguinetti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,896 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Davide Sanguinetti | #1,080 | #42 | 874 | 1,771 | 157 | 233 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Davide Sanguinetti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #95 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #48 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #65 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 10–27 | 27.0% | #91 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #46 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #270 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |