Jerome Golmard
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | 3 | 5 | 8 | Sep 3, 2004 | H2H |
| Alex Corretja | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 27, 2002 | H2H |
| Karol Kucera | 4 | 1 | 5 | Sep 26, 2002 | H2H |
| Thomas Enqvist | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 4, 2002 | H2H |
| Tommy Haas | 1 | 4 | 5 | Oct 11, 2001 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Jerome Golmard holds a 2–0 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jerome Golmard leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jerome Golmard won the 2000 Dubai Tennis Championships round of 32 6-4 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | Francisco Clavet | Match data | Feb 10, 2000* | R32 | Dubai Tennis Championships | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Jerome Golmard | 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | Francisco Clavet | Match data | Apr 8, 1999* | R32 | Estoril Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,884 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Francisco Clavet | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,808 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,565 | 0 | 8 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Francisco Clavet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1990 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1996 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1991 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 21 | 13 | 34 | 61.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 1997 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1992 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 24 | 1998 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1993 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 19 | 18 | 37 | 51.4% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1999 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1994 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 26 | 18 | 44 | 59.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2000 | 23 | 13 | 36 | 63.9% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1995 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 27 | 21 | 48 | 56.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2001 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1996 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 29 | 16 | 45 | 64.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 28 | 2002 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 28 | 12 | 40 | 70.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 2003 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 31 | 15 | 46 | 67.4% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | 2004 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 19 | 12 | 31 | 61.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | 16 | 13 | 29 | 55.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 18 | 13 | 31 | 58.1% | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 85 | 70 | 155 | 54.8% | 32 | 40 | 72 | 44.4% | 15 | 17 | 32 | 46.9% | 9 | 15 | 24 | 37.5% | — | 103 | 115 | 218 | 47.2% | 265 | 194 | 459 | 57.7% | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 9 | 20 | 29 | 31.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 242/283 of Jerome Golmard's and 586/686 of Francisco Clavet's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Francisco Clavet | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 1994 | 2/2 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 54.9% | 67.2% | 58.0% | 61.1% | 41.7% | 62.7% | 35.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 16/17 | 5.1 | 5.4 | 54.3% | 68.1% | 47.0% | 54.9% | 35.2% | 58.3% | 32.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 12/17 | 3.9 | 5.4 | 58.8% | 67.5% | 39.3% | 43.9% | 25.7% | 55.9% | 30.3% | 1991 | 57/64 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 64.4% | 65.1% | 54.4% | 58.6% | 47.8% | 61.1% | 43.6% |
| 23 | 1997 | 23/28 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 57.9% | 69.5% | 50.8% | 54.4% | 41.0% | 61.4% | 33.5% | 1992 | 61/68 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 61.5% | 66.2% | 51.5% | 55.4% | 45.8% | 60.4% | 41.4% |
| 24 | 1998 | 40/45 | 5.1 | 4.1 | 62.3% | 69.2% | 51.2% | 63.2% | 44.9% | 62.2% | 36.4% | 1993 | 41/47 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 63.3% | 60.2% | 47.3% | 51.1% | 47.9% | 55.4% | 40.8% |
| 25 | 1999 | 29/33 | 5.1 | 2.7 | 57.9% | 72.8% | 53.3% | 54.9% | 44.1% | 64.3% | 37.8% | 1994 | 38/46 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 66.3% | 64.0% | 50.8% | 54.9% | 42.3% | 59.4% | 41.5% |
| 26 | 2000 | 45/54 | 6.4 | 3.4 | 56.6% | 71.0% | 53.7% | 55.3% | 38.7% | 63.2% | 35.2% | 1995 | 50/58 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 63.2% | 65.6% | 52.4% | 53.6% | 43.7% | 60.5% | 43.2% |
| 27 | 2001 | 42/48 | 5.4 | 3.2 | 60.3% | 71.8% | 49.2% | 53.8% | 46.7% | 62.9% | 38.4% | 1996 | 57/65 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 62.7% | 65.2% | 54.2% | 52.7% | 50.0% | 61.3% | 40.1% |
| 28 | 2002 | 21/27 | 6.9 | 4.0 | 61.4% | 77.0% | 51.6% | 51.5% | 35.9% | 66.9% | 38.2% | 1997 | 57/65 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 64.2% | 65.4% | 51.0% | 52.4% | 49.3% | 60.2% | 42.3% |
| 29 | 2003 | 3/3 | 2.7 | 6.7 | 53.2% | 74.7% | 62.6% | 51.2% | 87.5% | 69.1% | 30.6% | 1998 | 55/69 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 63.0% | 68.0% | 53.4% | 57.1% | 48.9% | 62.6% | 41.0% |
| 30 | 2004 | 9/9 | 8.0 | 4.3 | 56.4% | 73.1% | 51.8% | 42.1% | 45.8% | 63.8% | 34.6% | 1999 | 48/57 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 63.9% | 66.7% | 54.4% | 56.9% | 43.2% | 62.0% | 39.8% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 48/58 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 63.3% | 68.2% | 54.3% | 52.5% | 43.2% | 63.1% | 40.2% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 43/50 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 61.5% | 66.1% | 57.1% | 59.7% | 43.8% | 62.5% | 39.4% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 25/33 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 66.9% | 63.6% | 49.1% | 53.6% | 38.6% | 58.5% | 36.0% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6/6 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 64.4% | 59.0% | 46.9% | 53.6% | 48.3% | 54.4% | 40.8% |
| Career | — | 242/283 | 5.5 | 3.8 | 58.8% | 71.2% | 50.9% | 54.8% | 41.8% | 62.7% | 35.9% | — | 586/728 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 63.5% | 65.5% | 52.6% | 54.9% | 45.9% | 60.7% | 41.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Francisco Clavet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1459 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +62 | — | 27.3% | -1.27 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.84 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1514 | 111.9 | +2.11 | -0.88 | 0.946 | 49.6% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.17 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.06 | 1989 | 1503 | 119.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +47 | — | 51.9% | +0.11 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.79 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1550 | 131.8 | -1.50 | -2.68 | 0.777 | 45.9% | +22 | +6 | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 2–4 (33%) | 6–1 (86%) | — | +0.02 | 1990 | 1576 | 125.5 | — | — | — | — | -79 | +53 | — | 46.3% | -0.31 | 4–7 (36%) | 8–4 (67%) | — | +0.01 |
| 22 | 1996 | 1425 | 100.2 | -4.28 | -4.47 | 0.687 | 44.2% | +138 | +11 | — | 29.5% | -1.25 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–1 | — | +1.31 | 1991 | 1753 | 137.7 | +0.53 | +3.48 | 1.123 | 52.2% | -104 | +39 | — | 56.1% | +0.66 | 9–7 (56%) | 12–12 (50%) | — | +1.58 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1547 | 122.9 | -0.42 | -3.18 | 0.869 | 47.8% | +25 | -86 | +102 | 46.4% | -0.23 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–6 (40%) | — | +0.72 | 1992 | 1758 | 149.6 | -0.34 | +2.57 | 1.046 | 50.7% | -49 | +112 | — | 53.9% | +0.27 | 14–8 (64%) | 13–10 (57%) | — | -1.12 |
| 24 | 1998 | 1718 | 137.1 | +0.32 | -1.03 | 0.965 | 49.6% | -39 | -228 | +12 | 54.7% | +0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 9–9 (50%) | — | -1.08 | 1993 | 1656 | 131.7 | -3.73 | +1.81 | 0.914 | 48.1% | -52 | +101 | — | 44.7% | -0.47 | 9–8 (53%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | -0.19 |
| 25 | 1999 | 1843 | 150.8 | +3.05 | +0.79 | 1.059 | 50.9% | -30 | -209 | — | 64.2% | +0.94 | 5–3 (63%) | 9–6 (60%) | — | -1.75 | 1994 | 1794 | 140.9 | +0.11 | +1.74 | 1.023 | 50.1% | — | +77 | — | 55.9% | +0.31 | 12–9 (57%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | -0.48 |
| 26 | 2000 | 1757 | 145.2 | +0.97 | -1.36 | 0.957 | 49.3% | +32 | -125 | -46 | 55.6% | +0.36 | 9–5 (64%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | -0.62 | 1995 | 1739 | 138.9 | +0.04 | +3.63 | 1.094 | 51.5% | -102 | +36 | — | 52.2% | +0.30 | 7–13 (35%) | 9–6 (60%) | — | +0.51 |
| 27 | 2001 | 1747 | 137.2 | +1.00 | +0.19 | 1.035 | 50.7% | +8 | -18 | -101 | 57.7% | +0.57 | 7–7 (50%) | 7–12 (37%) | — | +0.06 | 1996 | 1744 | 149.6 | -0.07 | +1.86 | 1.036 | 50.6% | -95 | +130 | — | 56.8% | +0.41 | 4–8 (33%) | 12–5 (71%) | — | -1.96 |
| 28 | 2002 | 1700 | 136.6 | +2.40 | +0.61 | 1.153 | 52.2% | +64 | — | — | 56.1% | +0.12 | 2–5 (29%) | 8–2 (80%) | — | +0.65 | 1997 | 1833 | 145.8 | -0.25 | +3.69 | 1.064 | 51.3% | -124 | +88 | -238 | 56.2% | +0.47 | 19–9 (68%) | 12–11 (52%) | — | -1.22 |
| 29 | 2003 | 1628 | 97.6 | +2.49 | -4.05 | 0.991 | 45.5% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.50 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.20 | 1998 | 1809 | 143.1 | +0.62 | +1.82 | 1.096 | 51.5% | -108 | +102 | -151 | 58.4% | +0.60 | 12–11 (52%) | 7–16 (30%) | — | +2.29 |
| 30 | 2004 | 1661 | 113.6 | -0.53 | -2.50 | 0.955 | 49.2% | +96 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.40 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.70 | 1999 | 1701 | 145.3 | +0.45 | +2.02 | 1.047 | 50.5% | -14 | +100 | -25 | 51.3% | +0.07 | 13–14 (48%) | 14–12 (54%) | — | -2.18 |
| 31 | 2005 | 1610 | 91.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1628 | 141.7 | +0.86 | +2.56 | 1.091 | 51.3% | -11 | +144 | +39 | 49.6% | +0.11 | 6–9 (40%) | 10–9 (53%) | — | -2.35 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1621 | 142.4 | +0.69 | +1.35 | 1.049 | 50.8% | +64 | -7 | — | 45.0% | +0.02 | 8–8 (50%) | 7–14 (33%) | — | +0.10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1564 | 130.1 | -1.84 | -0.91 | 0.869 | 47.5% | +66 | +2 | — | 37.6% | -0.63 | 4–8 (33%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | -0.77 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1566 | 114.4 | -1.08 | +0.90 | 0.894 | 47.9% | +83 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.77 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.23 |
| Career | — | 1885 | 140.8 | +0.66 | -1.09 | 0.961 | 49.4% | +20 | -84 | +6 | 52.5% | +0.11 | 39–44 (47%) | 56–47 (54%) | 104.6 | +0.05 | — | 1870 | 146.4 | -0.14 | +2.31 | 1.045 | 50.7% | -39 | +82 | -98 | 51.9% | +0.19 | 122–126 (49%) | 122–122 (50%) | 97.5 | -0.54 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | 3 | 5 | 8 | Sep 3, 2004 | H2H |
| Alex Corretja | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 27, 2002 | H2H |
| Karol Kucera | 4 | 1 | 5 | Sep 26, 2002 | H2H |
| Thomas Enqvist | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 4, 2002 | H2H |
| Tommy Haas | 1 | 4 | 5 | Oct 11, 2001 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Younes El Aynaoui | 8 | 3 | 11 | Jul 13, 2000 | H2H |
| Magnus Gustafsson | 4 | 6 | 10 | Oct 25, 2001 | H2H |
| Alberto Berasategui | 4 | 6 | 10 | Jul 27, 2000 | H2H |
| Javier Sanchez | 7 | 3 | 10 | May 22, 1998 | H2H |
| Carlos Moya | 1 | 8 | 9 | Sep 28, 2002 | H2H |