H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jerome Golmard vs Francisco Clavet H2H: 2-0

Jerome Golmard holds a 2–0 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jerome Golmard leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jerome Golmard won the 2000 Dubai third round 6-4 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jerome Golmard
FRA Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 10, 2000* Dubai ATP 250 R32 Hard Jerome Golmard #33 6-4 4-6 6-1 Francisco Clavet #37 Match data
Apr 8, 1999* Estoril ATP 250 R32 Clay Jerome Golmard #25 7-6(3) 7-6(5) Francisco Clavet #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jerome Golmard #1,178 #22 1,494 1,896 141 142 49.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jerome Golmard Francisco Clavet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0
20 1994 1–1 50.0% #208 1,514 0 0 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0
21 1995 6–11 35.3% #88 1,549 0 0 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1
22 1996 3–14 17.6% #143 1,423 0 0 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1
23 1997 12–16 42.9% #115 1,548 0 0 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1
24 1998 23–22 51.1% #47 1,716 0 0 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1
25 1999 21–12 63.6% #35 1,828 0 1 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1
26 2000 30–24 55.6% #42 1,755 0 2 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2
27 2001 27–21 56.2% #50 1,746 0 2 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3
28 2002 14–13 51.9% #99 1,699 0 2 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5
29 2003 0–3 0.0% #309 1,628 0 2 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7
30 2004 4–5 44.4% #211 1,662 0 2 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7
31 — — — — — — — 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8
34 — — — — — — — 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8