H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs Richard Fromberg H2H: 0-1
Richard Fromberg holds a 1–0 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richard Fromberg leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Fromberg won the 1996 Casablanca third round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1996* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Richard Fromberg | 6-0 6-4 | Jerome Golmard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,896 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Richard Fromberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 |