H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Jerome Golmard vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 0-5

Thomas Enqvist holds a 5–0 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2002 Adelaide fourth round 6-4 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jerome Golmard
FRA Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 4, 2002* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #24 6-4 4-6 6-1 Jerome Golmard #50 Match data
Oct 27, 2000* Basel ATP 250 R16 Carpet Thomas Enqvist #6 6-4 6-2 Jerome Golmard #40 Match data
Mar 15, 2000* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Thomas Enqvist #10 6-1 6-4 Jerome Golmard #48 Match data
Mar 21, 1999* Miami Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Thomas Enqvist #15 6-3 7-5 Jerome Golmard #32 Match data
Aug 14, 1995 Indianapolis ATP 250 QF Hard Thomas Enqvist #13 6-3 6-1 Jerome Golmard #131 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jerome Golmard #1,178 #22 1,494 1,896 141 142 49.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jerome Golmard Thomas Enqvist
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2
20 1994 1–1 50.0% #208 1,514 0 0 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2
21 1995 6–11 35.3% #88 1,549 0 0 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7
22 1996 3–14 17.6% #143 1,423 0 0 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10
23 1997 12–16 42.9% #115 1,548 0 0 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11
24 1998 23–22 51.1% #47 1,716 0 0 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13
25 1999 21–12 63.6% #35 1,828 0 1 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16
26 2000 30–24 55.6% #42 1,755 0 2 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18
27 2001 27–21 56.2% #50 1,746 0 2 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18
28 2002 14–13 51.9% #99 1,699 0 2 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19
29 2003 0–3 0.0% #309 1,628 0 2 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19
30 2004 4–5 44.4% #211 1,662 0 2 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19
31 — — — — — — — 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19