H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jesse Huta Galung vs Somdev Devvarman H2H: 0-1
Somdev Devvarman holds a 1–0 lead over Jesse Huta Galung in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Somdev Devvarman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Somdev Devvarman won the 2011 Johannesburg fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 40
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 41
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2011* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Somdev Devvarman | 6-3 6-4 | Jesse Huta Galung | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jesse Huta Galung | #1,606 | #91 | 609 | 1,630 | 5 | 25 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Somdev Devvarman | #1,347 | #62 | 771 | 1,799 | 49 | 70 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jesse Huta Galung | Somdev Devvarman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1116 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1033 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #128 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #126 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #209 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #108 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #84 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #101 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #664 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #195 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #90 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #436 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #138 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #909 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |