H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Jim Courier vs Adrian Voinea H2H: 1-1

Jim Courier and Adrian Voinea are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 1–0 on grass, while Adrian Voinea leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Adrian Voinea won the 1999 ASB Classic round of 32 7-6(5) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Courier
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Adrian Voinea
ROU Age 52 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Adrian Voinea #71 7-6(5) 6-1 Jim Courier #78 Match data Jan 14, 1999* R32 ASB Classic ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jim Courier #8 6-2 6-2 Adrian Voinea #66 Match data Jun 20, 1996* R32 Halle Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23
Adrian Voinea #1,046 #36 957 1,755 126 168 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Adrian Voinea
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1 1994 2–4 33.3% #202 1,492 0 0
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4 1995 13–19 40.6% #56 1,567 0 0
21 1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9 1996 28–25 52.8% #45 1,709 0 0
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1997 12–20 37.5% #139 1,629 0 0
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14 1998 11–9 55.0% #71 1,675 0 0
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18 1999 14–21 40.0% #100 1,650 0 1
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19 2000 9–20 31.0% #110 1,552 0 1
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 2001 11–11 50.0% #97 1,625 0 1
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23 2002 18–20 47.4% #68 1,635 0 1
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 2003 8–19 29.6% #154 1,531 0 1
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Courier Adrian Voinea
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1994 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7%
21 1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
22 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1998 4 4 8 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1999 2 6 8 25.0% 12 12 24 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2000 6 10 16 37.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 5 6 11 45.5% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
27 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2003 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8% — 47 61 108 43.5% 65 75 140 46.4% 5 14 19 26.3% 9 18 27 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 473/566 of Jim Courier's and 259/294 of Adrian Voinea's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Courier Adrian Voinea
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 5/6 2.0 0.6 66.1% 60.2% 41.2% 41.5% 51.4% 53.7% 43.2%
20 1991 60/74 5.4 2.2 63.3% 73.8% 56.0% 62.7% 44.2% 67.4% 41.3% 1995 28/32 5.8 3.0 59.0% 67.6% 51.2% 59.1% 44.9% 60.9% 37.4%
21 1992 69/84 5.3 2.4 60.8% 77.6% 55.0% 64.3% 45.3% 68.7% 41.7% 1996 46/53 5.2 2.9 58.6% 68.6% 50.9% 57.9% 40.5% 61.3% 36.8%
22 1993 61/75 4.9 2.7 60.8% 75.1% 56.5% 67.7% 45.3% 67.9% 41.7% 1997 30/32 5.9 3.4 56.9% 64.2% 45.8% 47.6% 40.5% 56.2% 38.0%
23 1994 54/62 4.1 2.5 61.6% 75.3% 53.5% 59.7% 45.0% 66.8% 40.8% 1998 16/20 4.8 2.4 56.2% 67.6% 53.3% 60.5% 52.9% 61.4% 36.2%
24 1995 66/79 5.4 2.9 62.0% 75.7% 54.4% 67.1% 47.4% 67.5% 40.1% 1999 31/35 5.5 3.1 53.9% 69.8% 49.1% 49.1% 46.5% 60.0% 37.7%
25 1996 40/45 5.9 3.2 60.1% 74.7% 53.8% 57.4% 43.4% 66.6% 39.6% 2000 25/29 6.1 3.4 58.8% 69.5% 45.7% 51.9% 36.5% 59.7% 33.6%
26 1997 43/53 4.8 3.0 59.8% 73.7% 52.8% 54.7% 45.2% 65.1% 38.2% 2001 20/22 4.6 3.1 53.8% 70.6% 49.8% 50.7% 42.8% 61.4% 38.4%
27 1998 31/36 4.9 2.2 64.3% 71.9% 52.8% 60.1% 36.6% 64.9% 36.9% 2002 32/38 6.2 4.2 54.9% 69.6% 50.0% 54.7% 34.0% 60.6% 36.5%
28 1999 41/49 6.0 2.5 66.0% 75.0% 55.7% 62.7% 39.4% 68.4% 36.5% 2003 26/27 5.6 3.8 56.6% 68.5% 46.9% 50.4% 49.2% 58.9% 33.1%
29 2000 8/9 6.3 2.8 59.3% 72.8% 52.6% 60.6% 42.6% 64.7% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 473/712 5.2 2.6 61.9% 75.0% 54.6% 62.5% 44.1% 67.2% 39.9% — 259/294 5.5 3.2 56.9% 68.3% 49.0% 53.3% 42.5% 59.9% 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Courier Adrian Voinea
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1712 137.9 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) — -3.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.68 1994 1493 101.4 -1.67 -1.23 0.933 48.4% — +28 — 33.3% -1.33 1–0 — — +0.43
20 1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) — -2.20 1995 1567 132.5 -0.38 -0.66 0.956 49.2% -80 +132 — 46.5% -0.26 3–8 (27%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.33
21 1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +17 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) — -1.89 1996 1710 138.7 -0.34 -0.30 0.952 49.5% -44 +61 -144 54.8% +0.16 8–9 (47%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.48
22 1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.11 1997 1629 126.5 -4.51 +0.39 0.866 47.2% +72 +45 -86 35.9% -0.96 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — -1.87
23 1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.52 1998 1675 130.7 -0.22 -0.64 0.938 49.0% +39 +25 — 51.1% -0.13 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.07
24 1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) — -0.63 1999 1651 125.5 -1.16 -0.03 0.943 48.8% -39 +66 — 43.6% -0.42 8–11 (42%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.55
25 1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) — -0.33 2000 1553 120.2 -1.75 -2.79 0.834 46.7% +49 +58 — 34.3% -1.00 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.04
26 1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) — -1.90 2001 1625 126.7 -0.04 -0.19 0.995 49.0% -8 +38 — 43.5% -0.44 3–2 (60%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.45
27 1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.91 2002 1636 128.1 -1.48 -0.75 0.926 48.6% +17 +4 -151 47.2% -0.24 8–5 (62%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.15
28 1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) — +0.59 2003 1531 117.5 -3.51 -2.55 0.805 46.6% +84 +19 — 37.9% -0.88 2–4 (33%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.56
29 2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1495 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47 — 1756 133.6 -1.52 -0.78 0.913 48.4% +4 +53 -131 44.5% -0.43 43–49 (47%) 63–54 (54%) 104.1 -0.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.