H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jim Courier vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 5-5

Jim Courier and Mark Woodforde are tied 5–5 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 4–3 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1998 Adelaide third round 7-5 6-2.

USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 5
10 main draw meetings
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 8, 1998* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Mark Woodforde #46 7-5 6-2 Jim Courier #21 Match data
Mar 2, 1996* Philadelphia ATP 250 SF Carpet Jim Courier #7 6-2 6-1 Mark Woodforde #25 Match data
Mar 16, 1995* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Mark Woodforde #34 6-3 6-4 Jim Courier #11 Match data
Mar 4, 1995* Scottsdale ATP 250 QF Hard Jim Courier #13 6-3 6-3 Mark Woodforde #35 Match data
Jan 22, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Jim Courier #11 6-3 6-3 6-3 Mark Woodforde #32 Match data
Jan 7, 1995* Adelaide ATP 250 SF Hard Jim Courier #13 6-3 6-4 Mark Woodforde #43 Match data
Nov 3, 1994* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Mark Woodforde #34 7-6(3) 6-3 Jim Courier #14 Match data
Mar 17, 1993* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Mark Woodforde #22 6-3 2-6 6-2 Jim Courier #1 Match data
Feb 6, 1992* San Francisco ATP 250 R32 Hard Jim Courier #2 7-6(7) 5-7 7-5 Mark Woodforde #94 Match data
Jul 1, 1990* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Mark Woodforde #175 7-5 5-7 7-5 6-4 Jim Courier #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,218 487 222 68.7% 4 5 0 0 14 23
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,880 0 1
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,861 0 1 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,047 1 4 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1
21 1992 66–15 81.5% #1 2,086 3 9 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,888 4 14 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,988 4 18 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,848 4 19 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,738 4 23 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4
30 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4
31 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4
32 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4
34 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4