H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Jim Courier vs Stefano Pescosolido H2H: 2-0

Jim Courier holds a 2–0 lead over Stefano Pescosolido in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1994 Roland Garros round of 64 7-5 6-0 6-7(7) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Courier
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Stefano Pescosolido
ITA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Courier #7 7-5 6-0 6-7(7) 6-4 Stefano Pescosolido #47 Match data May 27, 1994* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Jim Courier #1 6-2 6-2 Stefano Pescosolido #132 Match data Apr 1, 1993* R32 Osaka ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23
Stefano Pescosolido #1,500 #42 781 1,764 107 156 40.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Stefano Pescosolido
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #739 1,491 0 0
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1 1989 2–5 28.6% #225 1,482 0 0
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1 1990 4–11 26.7% #141 1,479 0 0
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4 1991 10–16 38.5% #65 1,538 0 0
21 1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9 1992 21–26 44.7% #62 1,591 0 1
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1993 14–14 50.0% #59 1,734 0 2
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14 1994 17–25 40.5% #113 1,622 0 2
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18 1995 20–17 54.1% #68 1,703 0 2
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19 1996 13–25 34.2% #136 1,583 0 2
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1997 0–2 0.0% #228 1,559 0 2
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23 1998 3–6 33.3% #183 1,567 0 2
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 1999 2–2 50.0% #193 1,583 0 2
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2003 0–2 0.0% #130 1,459 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2004 1–4 20.0% #233 1,466 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Courier Stefano Pescosolido
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1989 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
19 1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1991 7 6 13 53.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 1992 11 10 21 52.4% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
22 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1994 9 14 23 39.1% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1995 9 7 16 56.3% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1996 6 14 20 30.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1999 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8% — 53 62 115 46.1% 42 62 104 40.4% 5 10 15 33.3% 7 22 29 24.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 473/566 of Jim Courier's and 215/240 of Stefano Pescosolido's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Courier Stefano Pescosolido
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 60/74 5.4 2.2 63.3% 73.8% 56.0% 62.7% 44.2% 67.4% 41.3% 1991 24/26 4.3 3.6 56.0% 69.3% 49.7% 52.5% 47.6% 60.4% 38.3%
21 1992 69/84 5.3 2.4 60.8% 77.6% 55.0% 64.3% 45.3% 68.7% 41.7% 1992 41/47 4.4 5.0 50.8% 72.3% 49.0% 51.6% 39.2% 60.7% 36.7%
22 1993 61/75 4.9 2.7 60.8% 75.1% 56.5% 67.7% 45.3% 67.9% 41.7% 1993 26/28 3.7 4.5 51.3% 70.6% 48.4% 50.3% 44.1% 59.6% 37.3%
23 1994 54/62 4.1 2.5 61.6% 75.3% 53.5% 59.7% 45.0% 66.8% 40.8% 1994 38/42 4.4 3.9 50.1% 68.8% 49.1% 53.1% 43.1% 59.1% 37.3%
24 1995 66/79 5.4 2.9 62.0% 75.7% 54.4% 67.1% 47.4% 67.5% 40.1% 1995 31/37 5.1 3.9 51.9% 71.9% 50.6% 52.7% 40.3% 61.9% 38.7%
25 1996 40/45 5.9 3.2 60.1% 74.7% 53.8% 57.4% 43.4% 66.6% 39.6% 1996 35/38 4.3 5.4 51.6% 71.4% 43.2% 58.5% 42.3% 57.6% 37.1%
26 1997 43/53 4.8 3.0 59.8% 73.7% 52.8% 54.7% 45.2% 65.1% 38.2% 1997 2/2 2.0 3.0 55.4% 67.5% 48.4% 35.7% 33.3% 58.9% 31.7%
27 1998 31/36 4.9 2.2 64.3% 71.9% 52.8% 60.1% 36.6% 64.9% 36.9% 1998 7/9 4.7 4.3 53.8% 72.1% 42.8% 41.4% 30.3% 58.8% 34.9%
28 1999 41/49 6.0 2.5 66.0% 75.0% 55.7% 62.7% 39.4% 68.4% 36.5% 1999 4/4 6.0 5.8 50.7% 80.2% 53.3% 55.8% 29.6% 67.0% 32.1%
29 2000 8/9 6.3 2.8 59.3% 72.8% 52.6% 60.6% 42.6% 64.7% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 2/2 4.5 5.5 54.6% 70.4% 47.2% 31.8% 37.5% 60.1% 31.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/5 3.0 5.8 56.4% 68.2% 42.2% 46.6% 43.9% 56.7% 34.0%
Career — 473/712 5.2 2.6 61.9% 75.0% 54.6% 62.5% 44.1% 67.2% 39.9% — 215/263 4.4 4.5 51.9% 70.9% 48.0% 52.4% 41.7% 59.8% 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Courier Stefano Pescosolido
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1712 137.9 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) 104.7 -0.43 1988 1492 102.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
18 1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) 102.2 -3.51 1989 1483 106.8 — — — — — +16 — 25.0% -0.87 2–0 0–1 — +0.41
19 1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 97.9 -0.68 1990 1479 120.4 — — — — +57 +37 — 39.4% -0.61 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 99.7 +0.20
20 1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) 106.5 -2.20 1991 1539 124.9 -0.08 -0.54 0.969 49.6% +42 -22 — 44.6% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 7–9 (44%) 102.7 +0.91
21 1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +17 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) 105.2 -1.89 1992 1592 142.9 -0.26 -1.33 0.934 48.8% +44 -35 — 43.5% -0.44 8–7 (53%) 9–13 (41%) 103.6 -1.93
22 1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) 95.7 -1.11 1993 1734 137.5 -0.42 +0.57 0.923 48.5% -35 -98 — 50.0% -0.18 8–8 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.1 -0.28
23 1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) 90.0 +0.52 1994 1623 137.0 -1.47 -0.99 0.910 48.5% -3 +73 — 43.5% -0.43 6–9 (40%) 9–8 (53%) 97.8 -0.89
24 1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) 102.8 -0.63 1995 1704 132.6 +1.14 -0.02 1.015 50.5% -69 +87 — 52.8% +0.01 5–7 (42%) 10–5 (67%) 100.7 +0.14
25 1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) 93.2 -0.33 1996 1584 128.2 -2.47 -0.24 0.876 47.9% -35 +121 — 37.8% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 4–9 (31%) 95.2 -0.69
26 1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) 92.2 -1.90 1997 1560 104.5 -0.36 -2.55 0.772 45.2% — — — 0.0% -1.75 — 0–1 — +0.06
27 1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 97.8 +0.91 1998 1567 114.7 -1.34 -0.60 0.845 46.5% -10 — -12 41.7% -0.75 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 102.6 +0.09
28 1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) 110.4 +0.59 1999 1583 105.5 +0.95 -0.76 0.972 50.0% — — -14 55.6% 0.00 0–1 2–0 — +0.28
29 2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 +0.33 2000 1525 95.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1476 91.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1468 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1459 106.4 -0.19 +0.76 0.784 45.3% — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–2 — +0.08
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1466 105.1 -1.46 -0.16 0.785 45.2% — +76 — 21.4% -1.50 1–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.04
Career — 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47 — 1765 135.1 -0.67 -0.52 0.924 48.7% -3 +37 -13 43.2% -0.44 40–48 (45%) 53–53 (50%) 103.1 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.