H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Courier vs Tim Wilkison H2H: 2-0
Jim Courier holds a 2–0 lead over Tim Wilkison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1989 Cincinnati second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1989* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jim Courier | 6-2 6-4 | Tim Wilkison | Match data |
| Nov 12, 1988* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jim Courier | 6-3 6-3 | Tim Wilkison | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,218 | 487 | 222 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 23 |
| Tim Wilkison | #1,167 | #23 | 269 | 1,894 | 294 | 298 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Courier | Tim Wilkison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #54 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #95 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,086 | 3 | 9 | 1981 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #71 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 | 1982 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #61 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,888 | 4 | 14 | 1983 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,678 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 4 | 18 | 1984 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #39 | 1,765 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,848 | 4 | 19 | 1985 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #44 | 1,807 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 | 1986 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,738 | 4 | 23 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #55 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 | 1988 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,672 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,599 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #210 | 1,540 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 |