H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jim Grabb vs Stefano Pescosolido H2H: 1-0
Jim Grabb holds a 1–0 lead over Stefano Pescosolido in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1994 Indian Wells Masters second round 0-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1994* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jim Grabb | 0-6 6-3 6-3 | Stefano Pescosolido | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Stefano Pescosolido | #1,500 | #42 | 781 | 1,763 | 107 | 155 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Grabb | Stefano Pescosolido | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #739 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #225 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #141 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #65 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #62 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #113 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #68 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #193 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,461 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #233 | 1,467 | 0 | 2 |