H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Osborne vs Roy Barth H2H: 2-1
Jim Osborne holds a 2–1 lead over Roy Barth in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Jim Osborne leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Osborne won the 1970 Merion third round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 81
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 1970* | Merion | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Jim Osborne | 7-5 7-5 | Roy Barth | Match data |
| Sep 24, 1969* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jim Osborne | 6-4 5-7 11-9 | Roy Barth | Match data |
| Aug 19, 1969* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Roy Barth | 20-18 6-2 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Osborne | #831 | #211 | 0 | 1,817 | 118 | 121 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Roy Barth | #373 | #107 | 0 | 1,736 | 64 | 138 | 31.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Osborne | Roy Barth | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 16–11 | 59.3% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 13–24 | 35.1% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1969 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 6–29 | 17.1% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1970 | 26–29 | 47.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 1–26 | 3.7% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1971 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 4–21 | 16.0% | #126 | 1,370 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1972 | 8–20 | 28.6% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #136 | 1,403 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1973 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,396 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |