H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jimmy Arias vs Eddie Dibbs H2H: 2-0
Jimmy Arias holds a 2–0 lead over Eddie Dibbs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Arias leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jimmy Arias won the 1984 Houston Wct fourth round 6-2 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1984* | Houston Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jimmy Arias | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Eddie Dibbs | Match data |
| Jul 15, 1983* | Boston | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jimmy Arias | 4-6 7-5 (ret.) | Eddie Dibbs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmy Arias | #714 | #5 | 587 | 2,067 | 281 | 217 | 56.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Eddie Dibbs | #798 | #5 | 0 | 2,168 | 607 | 264 | 69.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jimmy Arias | Eddie Dibbs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #255 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,045 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #34 | 1,720 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #28 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1988 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,615 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 62–30 | 67.4% | #22 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 53–25 | 67.9% | #18 | 2,050 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 83–28 | 74.8% | #9 | 2,053 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 76–27 | 73.8% | #6 | 2,076 | 0 | 13 |
| 27 | 1992 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 82–27 | 75.2% | #6 | 1,998 | 0 | 17 |
| 28 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #178 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #10 | 2,033 | 0 | 18 |
| 29 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #334 | 1,638 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #12 | 1,928 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #25 | 1,976 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #55 | 1,795 | 0 | 22 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #90 | 1,817 | 0 | 22 |
| 33 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #711 | 1,640 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #351 | 1,748 | 0 | 22 |