H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jimmy Arias vs Harold Solomon H2H: 1-1
Jimmy Arias and Harold Solomon are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Arias leads 1–0 on clay, while Harold Solomon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jimmy Arias won the 1983 Nice third round 6-4 1-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 73
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 1983* | Nice | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jimmy Arias | 6-4 1-6 7-5 | Harold Solomon | Match data |
| Sep 5, 1981* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Harold Solomon | 7-6 7-6 3-3 (ret.) | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmy Arias | #714 | #5 | 587 | 2,067 | 281 | 217 | 56.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Harold Solomon | #1,115 | #5 | 2 | 2,161 | 578 | 334 | 63.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jimmy Arias | Harold Solomon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #255 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,045 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 61–39 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #34 | 1,720 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 71–32 | 68.9% | #17 | 1,983 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1988 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,615 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 72–29 | 71.3% | #8 | 2,041 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #14 | 2,001 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 70–33 | 68.0% | #9 | 1,903 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 65–23 | 73.9% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 1992 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 22 |
| 28 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #178 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 22 |
| 29 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #334 | 1,638 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,797 | 0 | 22 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #95 | 1,622 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #223 | 1,632 | 0 | 22 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 22 |
| 33 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #711 | 1,640 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,593 | 0 | 22 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1106 | 1,573 | 0 | 22 |